User talk:Mecmerfvn4norv4o
Language[edit]
Since this is RationalWiki English, please use English so other people can understand you. Thank you! Nerd (talk) 17:44, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- You really need to learn the difference between Objectivity and Neutrality. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 17:53, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Warning![edit]
Vandalize some more and you will be blocked. Nerd (talk) 17:51, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
Hey[edit]
We don't use Neutral Point of View here, so trying to make an article more "neutral" is not going to be productive. Just saying, so please just learn the rules and stick around. RoninMacbeth (talk) 17:58, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Take it from me- you’re not the first person to make that mistake. --RWRW (talk) 18:00, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
ASI ES[edit]
NO HAY NI OBJETIVIDAD NI NEUTRALIDAD ..ESO ES LO QUE SE BUSCA PARA ENCONTRAR LA VERDAD . Y LA CIENCIA — Unsigned, by: Mecmerfvn4norv4o / talk / contribs
ME HAN BLOQUEADO Y ATACADO POR PEDIR NEUTRALIDAD Y OBJETIVIDAD BRAVO[edit]
ASI ES RACIONAL WIKI ..COMO PUEDEN SER RACIONALES SI NO TIENEN PUNTOS DE VISTA NEUTRALES NO BUSCAN LA VERDAD ??? — Unsigned, by: Mecmerfvn4norv4o / talk / contribs
- Yelling does not make your point any more correct, nor does it change facts. All it does is show you cannot maintain a level head. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:19, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- First, "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!. Second, Neutrality is not necessarily good for finding the truth. See Balance fallacy. RoninMacbeth (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- Neutrality is the inability or unwillingness to pick a side or conclusion. Objectivity is the ability to pick the correct side or conclusion, regardless of the opinions of yourself or others. ☭Comrade GC☭Ministry of Praise 18:24, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
- First, "But I thought this was supposed to be RATIONALWiki!" Drink!. Second, Neutrality is not necessarily good for finding the truth. See Balance fallacy. RoninMacbeth (talk) 18:21, 7 July 2018 (UTC)