User talk:Whoak
|
Meh. You signing up for a RationalWiki account doesn't really move us one way or the other, Whoak.
This is probably because of your poor, obvious attempts at trolling or displays of unwelcome behavior. Maybe you should try to examine our articles and mission statement first, or take a walk outside. We realize that it's possible that you may be here in good faith, so we'll do our best to tolerate it. But don't expect us to get too excited. Our Newcomers' Guide may help clarify things for you. |
Just as a side note, creating an account, editing just food related talk pages and RW:SB and creating a Conservopedia account at the same time, will cause some people to get suspicious. --Andrew5 (talk) 00:38, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Why have I been suddenly blocked? Did I do something wrong? The block message was "we do not have checkuser here, you fucking liar. get lost". What on earth does that mean? Whoak (talk) 00:54, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I'm really sorry. Didn't meant to hurt anybody. Whoak (talk) 00:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cosmikdebris, @Plutocow Could you please tell me what's I did wrong? The block message was quite profane and meaningless.
- I do think @Cosmikdebris was being a little harsh, but honestly taking 3.6 days off wouldn't be the worst idea, trust me. --Andrew5 (talk) 01:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misread your statement in the bar, i read "andrew5 got someone to checkuser me" with a plea to get him get someone to checkuser you (we do not have checkuser here). Regardless, take a break, please. Conservapedia is not a major focus here and I think we've all grown past dealing with that sorry extremist blog and it's infantile politics and drama. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 01:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Since that have been cleaned up, could you unblock me please? Whoak (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think you would have gotten the hint that constant and repetitive concern trolling about something as useless as ken is not welcome here. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 01:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cosmikdebris He's thinking of placing a lawsuit against RationalWiki and the RMF! Plus, you've blocked me for something else not for this. Whoak (talk) 01:10, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I think you would have gotten the hint that constant and repetitive concern trolling about something as useless as ken is not welcome here. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 01:08, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Since that have been cleaned up, could you unblock me please? Whoak (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, I misread your statement in the bar, i read "andrew5 got someone to checkuser me" with a plea to get him get someone to checkuser you (we do not have checkuser here). Regardless, take a break, please. Conservapedia is not a major focus here and I think we've all grown past dealing with that sorry extremist blog and it's infantile politics and drama. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 01:04, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- I do think @Cosmikdebris was being a little harsh, but honestly taking 3.6 days off wouldn't be the worst idea, trust me. --Andrew5 (talk) 01:01, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cosmikdebris, @Plutocow Could you please tell me what's I did wrong? The block message was quite profane and meaningless.
|
This is not a topic to discuss here. Please refer any and all discussions about this issue to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ. |
—cosmikdebris talk stalk 01:14, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cosmikdebris I will promise that I will that thread to RationalWiki:LegalFAQ. Whoak (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Plutocow Could you please unblock me? As the discussion above shows, the blocking was done by mistake. Whoak (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Cosmikdebris was correct though - even if you weren't blocked for that, you are a probable meatpuppet of Ken. Take the time off, make mainspace contributions, and then you will probably be welcome. You're acting suspicious though, hence why you're blocked. Andrew5 (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Andrew5 Stay out of this conversation. And I wasn't blocked because of that, I was blocked for something completely different. @Cosmikdebris thought I was lying. This was untrue. Could Cosmikdebris, please, please UNBLOCK me please? 01:58, 8 November 2021 (UTC) — Unsigned, by: Whoak / talk / contribs
- Cosmikdebris was correct though - even if you weren't blocked for that, you are a probable meatpuppet of Ken. Take the time off, make mainspace contributions, and then you will probably be welcome. You're acting suspicious though, hence why you're blocked. Andrew5 (talk) 01:49, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Plutocow Could you please unblock me? As the discussion above shows, the blocking was done by mistake. Whoak (talk) 01:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Cosmikdebris I will promise that I will that thread to RationalWiki:LegalFAQ. Whoak (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Just fuck off. Bongolian (talk) 03:26, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Bongolian I was accused of lying about using the check user tool and thus was blocked, Cosmikdebris eventually apologised for it because he had made a mistake blocking me, however he has forgotten to unblock me. Could you please do it, I have done nothing wrong! Whoak (talk) 03:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE UNBLOCK ME? IF YOU HAVE READ THE THREAD ABOVE I WAS FOUND INNOCENT OF LYING FOR WHICH I WAS BLOCKED FOR! @Plutocow, @Bongolian, @Cosmikdebris PLEASE COULD YOU UNBLOCK ME?!!! PLEASE, I AM FUCKING BEGGING YOU!!!!!!!
Whoak (talk) 03:34, 8 November 2021 (UTC)- No. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 05:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- Just so you know, begging is not welcome here. Thanks for understanding. --Andrew5 mobile (talk) 15:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- No. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 05:30, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Bongolian I was accused of lying about using the check user tool and thus was blocked, Cosmikdebris eventually apologised for it because he had made a mistake blocking me, however he has forgotten to unblock me. Could you please do it, I have done nothing wrong! Whoak (talk) 03:31, 8 November 2021 (UTC)