Ad iram

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Part of the series on

Logic and rhetoric

Icon logic.svg
Key articles
General logic
Bad logic
Not to be confused with appeal to hate, where someone's prejudice is used to manipulate their opinions.

The argumentum ad iram fallacy (ad iram, Latin for "to anger") is an informal logical fallacy, that involves accusing one's opponent of being angry or holding their beliefs for anger-related reasons, which purportedly disproves their argument or diminishes its weight.

[edit] Form

  1. Person A says P.
  2. Person A hates P and/or Q.
  3. P is false.

[edit] Examples

For example:
Theist: My god will judge you for these acts you do!
Atheist: I disagree. I don't believe in God.
Theist: What did God do to you to make you hate him?

One can easily see the problem here. The atheist does not believe in the deity in question; thus, said atheist cannot hate what they do not believe in. Also, the atheist could have any reason not to believe in said god; the atheist's emotional state does not invalidate their claim.

It is also an ad-hominem attack and strawman argument that appears often on the Internet; e.g., a person disagrees on a political issue, and one side accuses the other of "being butthurt" and "crying like a little baby", even when no emotion was exhibited by the accused. It also applies to the idea that, if a person doesn't agree with a system they should "get out" and find a country that agrees with a strawman idea of what the dissenter believes.

[edit] See also

Personal tools