|It's gettin' hot in here|
Gore's Law states, as coined by Laanta in March 2008:
Immediately after making the post, commenters proceeded to nitpick at Gore — thus proving his point.
 Why Gore's Law is relevant
The problem with attacking Al Gore is that he has absolutely fuck all to do with the science of climate change, no matter his carbon footprint, PMRC involvement, Manbearpig, etc. You really can't find a better instance of poisoning the well.
Common examples and the reasons they are fallacious include:
- Al Gore is a Democrat.
- Al Gore stands to profit from climate change mitigation. Conflict of interest!
- There are number of errors made in Al Gore's film.
In Laanta's words: "Al Gore could be short, evil and fond of child sacrifice. He could emit more CO2 snoring at night than Christopher Monckton does all year. And his movie could be even more inaccurate than The Great Global Warming Swindle. But this wouldn't change a thing."
Was An Inconvenient Truth Nobel-worthy? It's certainly debatable. While Gore was awarded for popularizing the issue to the general public, others believe he received too much credit because the data involved was never his in the first place.
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 "Gore's Law", Long Ago and Not True Anyway
- ↑ He quickly acknowledged the criticism and lived up to it. So, you know, good for him.
- ↑ In fact, "Warmists" like Potholer54 have been quite scathing with him on occasions.
- ↑ He shares this title with almost all of the most voracious climate deniers.
- ↑ "Al Gore Wins the Nobel Peace Prize for Framing", Sandwalk
|Articles on RationalWiki about Eponymous laws|
|Badger's Law - Danth's Law - Feminist internet laws - Godwin's Law - Haggard's Law - Haig's Law - Internet law - List of Poe's Law examples - Loi de Poe - Murphy's Law - Poe's Law - Rove's Law - Whale.to|