|The dismal science|
|Competing Theme Parks|
|Rides And Rollercoasters|
 School choice in Europe
Sweden introduced a voucher system in 1992, which requires that students using vouchers are accepted on a first-come first-served basis. Denmark has done the same. In the Netherlands, public and private schools have been given financial equity since 1917, which resulted in a de facto voucher system.
The Dutch system is as "voucherized" as you can get, to the extent of covering a majority of the nation's students. It does seem to work without a hitch, but for various reasons, its success has been difficult to export elsewhere. The Swedes, for example, may reconsider their entire approach after a series of recent scandals.
 School choice in the US
Possibly the biggest problem with this is tax money being used to fund religious education, a big no-no in places such as the United States where separation of church and state is supposed to be a thing. This has already occurred in states that have or had voucher programs such as Florida, where public money was funding schools with educational curricula including creationism. No surprise, then, that the Religious Right and their donors are major proponents of "school choice" (read: tax money for religious indoctrination).
Proponents argue that competition would force public schools to perform to keep up. Private school students generally perform better on reading and math tests; however, the U.S. Department of Education found that when adjusted for factors such as race and gender, private schools perform about as well as public schools.
Opponents also argue that any difference comes from the fact that private schools tend to reject applicants from disadvantaged backgrounds or with behavioral problems, while public are required by law to take anyone. In other words, it's not a shock that schools full of rich white kids with private tutors have better results. "School choice" also can be seen as de facto segregation, especially in The Southern United States.
 Legal decisions
- The program must have a valid secular purpose,
- Aid must go to parents and not to the schools,
- A broad class of beneficiaries must be covered,
- The program must be neutral with respect to religion, and
- There must be adequate non-religious options.
However, a number of state supreme courts have ruled against vouchers that would fund religious schools, like Florida, or they have been voted down by referendum such as in California, Michigan, and Utah, of all places.
- ↑ Swedish Parents Enjoy School Choice, BBC
- ↑ Private Education Provision and Public Finance: The Netherlands, World Bank
- ↑ Sweden Introduced School Choice—Then it Got Ugly, Slate
- ↑ Creationism and School Vouchers
- ↑ Blindly Supporting Blind Faith, Science Blogs
- ↑ Educational Choice and Hooey: School Vouchers Help Religious Schools Not Families, Americans United
- ↑ Vouchers/Tax Credits Funding Creationism, Revisionist History, Hostility Toward Other Religions
- ↑ Comparing Private Schools and Public Schools Using Hierarchical Linear Modeling, National Center for Education Statistics
- ↑ Racial Segregation and the Private/Public School Choice, University of California, Santa Cruz
- ↑ Zelman v. Simmons-Harris at Findlaw
- ↑ Florida Supreme Court Blocks School Vouchers, New York Times
- ↑ Voters in California, Michigan Overwhelmingly Reject School Vouchers, Americans United
- ↑ Utah Voters Defeat Measure to Create First Statewide Voucher Program, Fox News