|
https://www.dropbox.com/s/q4z6qa561roidh5/femfreq_annualreport2014.pdf?dl=0
Shouldn't we celebrate her accomplishment? 400k for pretending to be scared of death threats that authorities have said weren't real threats is quite impressive. Look at how scared she is with her constant smirking in this video: http://youtu.be/gAyncf3DBUQ . It is almost like she knows she'll get a huge surge in "donations" so she'll never have to do any real work.
I would applaud her skill at suckering in so many people, but at this point the people supporting her have proven they are gullible shits with no grasp on reality.
Seriously though, considering the state of this article, whoever is trolling it must be either a complete whackjob or somehow acquainted with this grifter whore. — Unsigned, by: 67.42.177.3 / talk / contribs
- "Gullible shits with no grasp on reality." And who convinced you of this fact? Trick (talk) 18:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- The authors of this article, but try to stay on topic. This article doesn't discuss that Anita raked in over half a million dollars from gullible fucktards. This is a great accomplishment and I think it is sexist that you are minimizing her accomplishment. — Unsigned, by: 67.42.177.3 / talk / contribs
141.134.75.236 (talk) 18:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Salty. Trick (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- That's right. I'm a troll because the authors of this article are verified liars who just invent what their tumblr blog sources say.
- ...you do understand, like, as a concept, that the total income of a company doesn't go straight into the CEO's pocket? Like, is your brain able to handle the paradigm that companies and products actually cost money to produce and maintain, and that there is a difference between a company's gross income and its profit?
- Also, have you ever even read what the FBI and the Utah police said about the threat, or are you just speaking out of your ass? Because they very much agreed that the threat was not "totally a joke, lolz", they just didn't think that the person would be able to successfully carry it out. The FBI's even investigating the source of the threat, dumb shit.192.249.47.186 (talk) 18:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- List the products that she has produced that have cost over half a million dollars. List her expenses. It doesn't cost any money to keep her videos on youtube. It doesn't cost her money to use twitter as a propaganda platform. You are talking out of your ass when you pretend she isn't raking in this money. Where is the money going? If she doesn't live off this shit then what is her real job (i.e. that pays her living expenses)?
- Your source isn't accessible to me. Try this one from the actual university: http://www.usu.edu/ust/index.cfm?article=54179 . Allow me to quote, " there was no threat to students, staff or the speaker, so no alert was issued." Do you get it? NO CREDIBLE THREAT to the speaker. She even told them she didn't cancel because of the threat but because they wouldn't pat people down for legally concealed weapons. Do you fucking get it? The plan was to either cancel the event, to pretend to be a victim, or have ABC video tape people getting patted down to show how she is in oh-so-much danger. She rakes in the cash every time she convinces retards that she is in danger. How many feminist video game "critics" have been attacked or killed? Must be an impressive number right?
Zero (talk - contributions) 19:13, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- There was no 'immediate threat' because the talk was cancelled, you dumbfuck. Learn how to computer and read the link you thought was inaccessible. Queexchthonic murmurings 19:28, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Wrong,you are another liar or retard. I quote from the university: "Throughout the day, USU police worked to assess the level of threat with other local, state and federal agencies, including the Utah Statewide Information and Analysis Center, the FBI Cyber Terrorism Task Force, and the FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit. After a careful assessment of the threat, law enforcement officials determined that it was similar to other threats that Sarkeesian received in the past." So "throughout the day" means they assessed the threat level throughout the day prior to the speech. She cancelled despite there being no real threat. She then raked in $400k that quarter after running around claiming she was threatened. Your statement about there being no immediate threat because the talk was cancelled is nowhere in evidence from the statement made by the university. That makes you yet another in a long line of these feminist liars.
- Apparently, you can't read. There is nothing in the passage you quoted that even implies that there was no threat. It just says it was similar to previous threats. Queexchthonic murmurings 19:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm sorry a slightly nuanced reading of the university's statement didn't directly contradict what you made up out of thin air. Speaking of reading comprehension, I've always been talking about credible threats, I never said she wasn't threatened, but that they weren't credible. So you just lied when you implied I said there was no threat. I've had people threaten to kill me online too. I just didn't feel the need to pretend to be a damsel in distress about it in order to con people into giving me cash.
- I think I trust the FBI to make that judgement more than you. In any case, what I said works just as well if you insert the word 'credible'. It's not a 'nuanced reading'. It's the Department of Making Shit Up Because I Can't Interpret Reality Except Through My Messed Up Preconceptions. Have you read the hjnews link yet? Perhaps you should. Queexchthonic murmurings 19:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- The Federal officials involved said there was no threat per, " in conjunction with several teams of state and federal law enforcement experts, determined that there was no threat to students, staff or the speaker." So you continue to lie and have a queer view of reality. This isn't surprising considering the massive fuckups that have latched onto this bimbo.
- Woohoo...more threatening and offensive behavior about why her critics are not threatening and offensive. It is so convincing. -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 19:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
List any specific threat that I made against her. You just proved you guys lie every time you open your mouths rather than post regurgitated troll icons like the little lambs that you are.
- Awwww, so cute! A little internet tough guy. I love it when their face gets all red and they huff like they are having a hissy fit. Are you a super black belt in internet karate too? -EmeraldCityWanderer (talk) 19:21, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I'm not seeing any examples of any threats that I issued. I am seeing a pathetic attempt to distract from the fact that you are all liars who won't even call each other out for being liars.
|