The 2024 Legal Defense Fundraiser has ended early due to the Board's decision to settle the suit. Donations will go towards the creation of a legal defense fund. Discussion on the matter can be found at the RationalMedia Foundation noticeboard. Thank you for your generous support.

Information icon.svg Campaigning is open for the RationalWiki 2024 Board of Trustees election.

Physics envy

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 20:20, 12 June 2020 by Bongolian (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
We control what
you think with

Language
Icon language.svg
Said and done
Jargon, buzzwords, slogans
In the humanities — literary criticism, anthropology and so on — there's a field called TheoryWikipedia;

"We're just like the physicists. They talk incomprehensively? We can talk incomprehensively! They have big words? We'll have big words! They draw far-reaching conclusions? We'll draw far-reaching conclusions! We're just as prestigious as they are."

Now if [the physicists] say, "Well, look — we're doing real science and you guys aren't", then that's white male/sexist/bourgeois/whatever the answer is.
Noam Chomsky, a linguist.[1]

Physics envy (cf. "penis envy") is a phrase used to criticize procrustean attempts to make a discipline more "scientific" (or perhaps just more "sciencey") by aping the form of the physical sciences, usually through what is claimed to be excessive use of formal logic or mathematicization.

The term was coined by biologist Joel E. Cohen in a 1971 issue of Science.[2]

A rather literal example of this is the borrowing of equations from contemporary physics by the "marginalist school" of economists during the 19th century.[3]


See also

Further reading

  • Segura, Julio and Carlos Rodríguez Braun (eds.) (2004). An Eponymous Dictionary of Economics — A Guide to Laws and Theorems Named after Economists. Edward Elgar Publishing. 

External links

References