RationalWiki's 2020 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2120Goal: $3500

Conservapedia talk:Burning the Evidence

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Wigocp.svg

This Conservapedia related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Silverbrain.png
Editorial notes
  • Too many in jokes
  • Only one cite
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>

Shout out to PZ Myers - Can I read this somewhere?![edit]

I am intrigued.

Random comment[edit]

This is a random comment, inserted in to a talk page. --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 15:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

This is a reply to that random comment which attempts to derail serious conversation with the insertion of sophomoric humour, or perhaps a reference to memes. Omnomnomnom cocks. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Heh heh. Touché. --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 15:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm just here for the food. LordSlug All Heil Me! 04:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
And I'm Backin' Up, 'cos my Daddy taught me good. DogP (talk) 07:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

An Automated Means of Uncovering Oversighted Articles?[edit]

I imagine work has already began, but if not - there is a relatively simple (conceptually, but the code would be a b!tch) way for someone with the appropriate skills to uncover oversights. One would need to create a bot (or many, really) that performs binary comparison on each diff of each article, systematically. More realistically, a tool could be created that compares every diff of a single article. This would reveal, as far as I can see, any additional, un-logged edits that occurred between the 'old' and 'new' version of the article. Has anyone started (or completed!) development on a tool of this nature?

Talkpage entries are also deleted on Wikipedia[edit]

true story.

Sometimes the edit history is taken with it. 24.85.161.72 (talk) 23:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Why is the article showing up right aligned?[edit]

After a certain point in the Richard Dawkins discussion, all the paragraphs are flush right and ragged left. Can someone fix this? Bootmii(Nomic) 05:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Appears to be intentional (see 'align="right"' in div). No idea why. It does make for an uncomfortable read. Scream!! (talk) 11:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)