Conservapedia talk:Burning the Evidence
Shout out to PZ Myers - Can I read this somewhere?!
I am intrigued.
This is a random comment, inserted in to a talk page. --Ask me about your mother 15:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- This is a reply to that random comment which attempts to derail serious conversation with the insertion of sophomoric humour, or perhaps a reference to memes. Omnomnomnom cocks. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
An Automated Means of Uncovering Oversighted Articles?
I imagine work has already began, but if not - there is a relatively simple (conceptually, but the code would be a b!tch) way for someone with the appropriate skills to uncover oversights. One would need to create a bot (or many, really) that performs binary comparison on each diff of each article, systematically. More realistically, a tool could be created that compares every diff of a single article. This would reveal, as far as I can see, any additional, un-logged edits that occurred between the 'old' and 'new' version of the article. Has anyone started (or completed!) development on a tool of this nature?
Talkpage entries are also deleted on Wikipedia