Conservapedia talk:Burning the Evidence

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Wigocp.svg

This Conservapedia related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Silverbrain.png
Editorial notes
  • Too many in jokes
  • Only one cite
This page is automatically archived by Archiver
Archives for this talk page: <1>

Shout out to PZ Myers - Can I read this somewhere?![edit]

I am intrigued.

Random comment[edit]

This is a random comment, inserted in to a talk page. --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 15:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

This is a reply to that random comment which attempts to derail serious conversation with the insertion of sophomoric humour, or perhaps a reference to memes. Omnomnomnom cocks. TheoryOfPractice (talk) 15:17, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
Heh heh. Touché. --ConcernedresidentAsk me about your mother 15:18, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
I'm just here for the food. LordSlug All Heil Me! 04:55, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
And I'm Backin' Up, 'cos my Daddy taught me good. DogP (talk) 07:39, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

An Automated Means of Uncovering Oversighted Articles?[edit]

I imagine work has already began, but if not - there is a relatively simple (conceptually, but the code would be a b!tch) way for someone with the appropriate skills to uncover oversights. One would need to create a bot (or many, really) that performs binary comparison on each diff of each article, systematically. More realistically, a tool could be created that compares every diff of a single article. This would reveal, as far as I can see, any additional, un-logged edits that occurred between the 'old' and 'new' version of the article. Has anyone started (or completed!) development on a tool of this nature?

Talkpage entries are also deleted on Wikipedia[edit]

true story.

Sometimes the edit history is taken with it. 24.85.161.72 (talk) 23:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Why is the article showing up right aligned?[edit]

After a certain point in the Richard Dawkins discussion, all the paragraphs are flush right and ragged left. Can someone fix this? Bootmii(Nomic) 05:06, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

Appears to be intentional (see 'align="right"' in div). No idea why. It does make for an uncomfortable read. Scream!! (talk) 11:40, 30 November 2013 (UTC)