2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $7136.34Goal: $10000

User talk:Bootmii

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Archives for this talk page: , (new)

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, Bootmii!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

So babe, do you come here often? And if so, why? BbMaj7 Doin' to you in your ear hole. 21:01, 12 August 2011 (UTC)

Join the hivemind[edit]

Assimilation.gif Tyrannisan iron, yet caring fist

Your a sysop[edit]

Try not to fuck it up. AceModerator

User Rights[edit]

Make good edits for a while, the rights will reappear soon enough. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 08:12, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

I hope you don't mind, but[edit]

I've moved User:Bootmii/Conservapedia:Liberal claptrap to Conservapedia:Schlafly debate tactics#Liberal Claptrap. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 18:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)


Okay. Bootmii(Nomic) 23:10, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Any other ideas to prevent ballot stuffing by socks or do you think we just have to live with it or that it's no big deal?[edit]

Hiya Bootmii,

You've rejected both suggestions for preventing ballot stuffing by socks in future elections and while I understand your reasoning, I wonder what your thoughts are on this issue. Do you think this issue:

  1. Is not really much of a problem?
  2. Is something we just have to live with (e.g. as the cost of not unfairly disenfranchising actual editors)?
  3. Should be solved in some other way (if so, what d o you suggest)?
  4. Something else I haven't thought of (elaborate)?

I'm interested in your take on this as a longtime but relatively inactive (by volume of edits) editor as this can be a hard segment to gauge. ScepticWombat (talk) 08:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

CheckUser can work; thus far the ballot-stuffing has been performed only by known or already suspected socks, so I wouldn't worry about it blending into factionalization too much. At the same time, we're getting almost as many bureaucrats per user as Citizendium (50-60 users voted for 9 mods, and there's also trustees and other positions), so lowering the barrier to autoconfirmed non-sockpuppet users could work. Bootmii(Nomic) 23:35, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

Your CP Night editing Page[edit]

I've made some minor edits to your Conservapedia:Night editing page - just adding the cpmothball tag (to keep it inline with other CP pages on RW) and removed the red link at the bottom. I hope you don't mind, but please feel free to revert if you do. JumboWhales (talk) 19:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)