|
Nominations and Campaigning for the 2024 RationalWiki Moderator Election are now open |
Fun talk:Uighur Genocide
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
wtf am I looking at here?--Hastur! (talk) 07:45, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- This page is used to troll tankies. Since a barrage of them attempted to "debunk" our article on the Uighurs, I made this page to troll them.--Noobmaster420 (talk) 07:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- Look, this isn’t an attack on you, and I appreciate dunking on ““Marxist-Leninist”” types (lmao bc the best way to get a stateless society is to establish a strong authoritarian state, wow u guys r snart) but this article is kinda like. Muddled and useless in my opinion??? The argument is very difficult to parse, it just seems like “wow the guy u like said some bad shit”, which isn’t ideal imo. Also I reaaaaally don’t think we should have a Funspace article about a dang genocide but eh. ❣️ ASELAಮಾತು ❣️ 12:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- I agree. If you think you're going to need to say the same thing to commies over and over again, make a template. But the words "fun" and "genocide" just do not go together. Spud (talk) 13:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- (ec) debunking falsehoods and the like is essentially our intention on rw, and while the 'mission' has some broad interpretations, shit stirring is too much of a stretch, even for fun space, which as noted above by asela and spud anything with fun in the title should not ever directly reference an ongoing genocide.
- Look, this isn’t an attack on you, and I appreciate dunking on ““Marxist-Leninist”” types (lmao bc the best way to get a stateless society is to establish a strong authoritarian state, wow u guys r snart) but this article is kinda like. Muddled and useless in my opinion??? The argument is very difficult to parse, it just seems like “wow the guy u like said some bad shit”, which isn’t ideal imo. Also I reaaaaally don’t think we should have a Funspace article about a dang genocide but eh. ❣️ ASELAಮಾತು ❣️ 12:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
- we dont need pages trolling tankies or anyone for that matter. the actual article on the uighur genocide is already about 50% trolling and its not needed there either. there are issues with that page that cannot simply be disregarded as 'tankies' or apologists for the chinese government. what know that is verifiable from documents and google earth satelite photos, and witness testimony that can be corroborated is already enough to justify a strictly legal application of genocide. but some conclusions we draw go further than there is evidence for, including some things i have not seen anywhere else.
- i will go into more detail on the relevant talk page. AMassiveGay (talk) 14:16, 6 November 2020 (UTC)