RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/BADD

BADD | Result: Keep

BADD (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Keep

1. I think this is on the ball about the silly moral panics that have come across. Zero ^{(talk - contributions)} 12:54, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
2. A Particularly famous moral panic no less. Without this, no Dark Dungeons. You can't delete poor black leaf again! It's precisely the kind of thing rationalwiki would be actively engaging if it existed in the 80s. So on mission. Ikanreed (talk) 13:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
3. Seems like an obvious candidate for keepage. Wěǎšěǐǒǐď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 20:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
4. Still has effects to this day. Thanos6 (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
5. On-topic and informative - David Gerard (talk) 20:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
6. Keep. We don't need to keep folding pages in on themselves until there is only 8-9 superpages covering everything on this site. --Revolverman (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

Delete

1. Is a long-defunct group really relevant?^{— Unsigned, by: Kels / talk / contribs}

Goat

• Merge into Dungeons and Dragons. Sophie^Wilder 20:02, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
• Unless it can really expand, merge into D&D like ^ said.--Miekal 21:27, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect (in case someone is searching a 80's reference) with Dungeons and Dragons supported--dx (talk) 08:47, 6 October 2014 (UTC)