There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Conservapedia:JoeyJ
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservapedia:JoeyJ | Result: Deleted[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Pitiful stub. Also, the description of said editor could pretty much match any editor at Conservapedia, which means we'd have to create a bunch more stub-level articles to cover them all. ᎠᎥamᎧndᎠᎥᎦᏣ1(talk) 03:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Not a particularly notable or controversial editor. Not particularly liked or disliked by any of the admins. Not worth bothering with. Spud (talk) 06:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- Useless bland stub that adds nothing to our knowledge of Conservapedia, and has no jokes. Begone! Boredatwork (talk) 12:39, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- D, All of the above. GrammarCommie(talk)
Keep[edit]
Merge/redirect[edit]
Goat[edit]
You might also want to delete the talk page, as it consists solely of the BLP template. Boredatwork (talk) 18:49, 22 November 2017 (UTC)