RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/David Kilcullen

David Kilcullen | Result: Delete

David Kilcullen (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. This page about a living person has been here for 11 years and has yet to include a citation. Bongolian (talk) 02:43, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
2. A plain article about a military strategist's theory that neither supports or attacks it? why? We're not StrategyWiki. It looks like it was meant as an implicit criticism of our tactics in Iraq, but I don't see the point as our Iraq war article does the job much more effectively. Avida Dollars^{her again} 11:08, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
3. The original author claims that it's based on some personal research they did. Normally I'd want to move this to a draft page, but I don't think it serves any purpose here. —cosmikdebris ^talk stalk 14:27, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

   Even personal research should include citations (minimally something like "I got this information from interviewing X on date Y"). Bongolian (talk) 17:02, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

   Ugh, that sounds too much like Andy Schafly citing a dinner conversation he had with a judge. Avida Dollars^{her again} 17:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

4. What makes them missional exactly? Seems mostly like a fluff piece written on someone. Recommend deletion unless there is a missional reason to have an article on them. Techpriest ^{(I am Alpharius! / / / )} 19:15, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
5. What everyone else said. Christopher (talk) 19:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)