RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Florentin Smarandache

Florentin Smarandache | Result: Deleted[edit]

It's a hopelessly tiny stub and unclear. DïämöńđDïsc1 (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear missionality. Very little to nothing is lost if it's deleted. --Cosmikdebris (talk) 18:46, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

I don't even know if this is even missional. But assuming it is, it seems to be a long enough article, though with little expansion potential. The worst part about this article is that is filled with jargon (e.g. "vixra", "in arxiv is GM", "a lateral thinker in a quite vertical series of publications" (wtf), "neutroscophy", "math is quite vertical" (again, wtf!?). Ironic that this article itself "confuses people with mathematical verbiage and a long list of nonsensical validity". I would support a rewrite of this mess more than a deletion though. This article may have some use per "case study" section, but as it stands, I think it only barely has a reason to be on this site. --It's-a me, Lefty Green Mario! 21:26, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand the jargon either. I'm also rather concerned that the page is only in the Living people category and not in any others. That makes me wonder if its really missional. I'm really left wondering why I should care. It seems that the implication of the page is that Florentin Smarandache is a pseudo-mathematician. On the basis of the page, however, I can't see what real harm he could do or why anybody should pay any attention to him. Spud (talk) 05:55, 25 March 2017 (UTC)