There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Franz-Peter Tebartz-van Elst | Result: Deleted[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Isn't really missional. DιαμοπdDιςc1(talk) 04:12, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think this guy is (for lack of a better word) important enough for us to justify giving him his own article. DuceMoosoliniForum Romanum 05:01, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Aside from being non-notable, this has nothing to do with the topic of the wiki. Bad behavior from a bishop is not automatically a sign of irrationality or pseudoscience.user:Vivisectionist
- Uh, I don't see where it's missional. Delete swiftly and with extreme prejudice. Σπριγγίνα (ομιλία) (συνεισφορές) @ 03:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
Merge/redirect[edit]
- A cleric who missspent diocese funds doesn't really justify a full article but he could go in a list of naughty vicars if we have such a thing. Boredatwork (talk) 08:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)