RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Freedom

Freedom | Result: Deleted

Freedom (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Basically the same as the just deleted Resistance page. It consists of just a few short quotes. While somewhat amusing I don't think it meets rational wiki's criteria. *shrug* NonPerson (talk) 02:11, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
2. ^This. Although there are currently about 50 page that link to it. Wèàšèìòìď^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 07:31, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

   That may be why someone bothered writing it - David Gerard (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

   That's why I wrote it. --Theoneandonlyduncan^{Send me hate mail} 18:36, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

3. Not as good as a red link would be - David Gerard (talk) 08:57, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
4. We all know what freedom is. I can scarcely imagine having much to say about it. Wehpudicabok [話] [変] [留] 09:22, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
5. Delete as bourgeoisie pseudosociology. On a more serious note, it could possibly be a missional article, but it's unacceptable in its current state. |₹Λ¥$€₦₦ ^{The devil found it objectionable, so he banished it to Dollarama} 04:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

   Please improve it. --Theoneandonlyduncan^{Send me hate mail} 18:37, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

6. Better as red link. Making it a missional article will be a huge job, best saved for an epoch of inspiration on the part of an experienced RW editor. RIght now, I'm not feeling it. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 19:00, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Goat

1. If Freedom isn't Liberty, then just write/improve the damn article already :/ . On the other hand, if we can merge that with liberty.... [[User:K61824|]][[User_talk:K61824|]] 12:00, 15 June 2014 (UTC)