RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Template:Pseudoscientist

Template:Pseudoscientist | Result: Delete

Template:Pseudoscientist (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Rather pointless and not used very much. Doesn't look particularly good either. Christopher (talk) 07:50, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
2. It's not very sexy. Spud (talk) 15:12, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
3. Provides room to other psuedoscientists. Contractor (talk) 15:48, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

   What does "provides room to other psuedoscientists" mean? Christopher (talk) 16:01, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

   In the sense that we are giving more space to pseudoscience field, despite a standard template can be still used. Contractor (talk) 16:13, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

   Oh, I see. Christopher (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

4. Castaigne2 (talk) 21:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)

Keep

1. Like other infoboxen, this provides a useful at-a-glance assessment of the featured pseud. Ithaca8 (talk) 15:37, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
2. Unlike some other, purely derogatory templates, this looks rather useful. What it might need is more usage and publicity. - Smerdis of Tlön, ^{LOAD "*", 8, 1.} 15:52, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

Goat

1. I think a generalized "TLDR box" could be a good idea. This one is a bit specific and isn't exactly gorgeous. 19:44, 31 May 2017 (UTC)

• I don't like how this pushes the category box. This box have to be placed somewhere else in the article if it's to be used in more articles. --It's-a me, LeftyGreenMario! 18:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

1. this will have to be redone if its going to be used Vorarchivist (talk) 22:30, 13 June 2017 (UTC)