RationalWiki talk:Bureaucrat guide

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Nominating 'crats?[edit]

Perhaps a small procedure--a nomination and a seconding, and if no objections, then demote to 'crat? TheoryOfPractice 10:55, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Yeah, I want MOAR POWERZ, dammit! --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 11:20, 12 February 2009 (EST)
I'll second you if you nominate me, Edgerunner. And I'll buy you a Doom Bar if you ever swing by Aylesbury Totnes. Totnesmartin 11:36, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Hell yeah! You should definitely have MOAR POWERZ. And, of course, beer is always the best bribe (in addition to being the cause of and solution to all of life's problems). --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 11:44, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Great! who shall we go and pester for 'cratship? Totnesmartin 11:52, 12 February 2009 (EST)
ToP brought it up. He seems to be the most logical. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 11:54, 12 February 2009 (EST)
I second you and Martin's encrattening. Evil harmonic Phantom! 11:56, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Not me! Evil harmonic Phantom! 11:53, 12 February 2009 (EST)
Requests put in. Now, to the off-licence... Totnesmartin 12:04, 12 February 2009 (EST)

I'll have to check back later. I'm at work and am off to a meeting. --Edgerunner76Your views are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter 12:06, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Special pages[edit]

Bureaucrat1.png Evil harmonic Phantom! 11:01, 12 February 2009 (EST)

Request for help?[edit]

Wasn't sure where to put this. I'll delete it once it's dealt with. Could a Bureaucrat possibly hide the two recent IP edits to Conservapedia:Andrew Schlafly's greatest insights? Wasn't logged in... thanks. DalekEXTERMINATE 00:15, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

You don't need crat status to hide something from most, you only need help from crats if you need it hidden from other sysops here. --Onion <talk> 00:29, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
What is going on here, first we are hiding names and now memory-holing conversations? - π 01:41, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I know, Irrational One. That's what I thought. Lord Goonie Hooray! I'm helping! 01:43, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
No one is memory-holing conversations, the revision issue is not a new debate. Tmtoulouse (talk) 01:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
And I already rolled back the deletion of this conversation. Lord of the Goons The official spikey-haired skeptical punk 01:44, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I think the deletion of the conversation was a misunderstanding. Tmtoulouse (talk) 01:46, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Apologies, I didn't mean to hide this conversation, I just was pretty sure it doesn't go here. Sorry. Man, need to be more careful. DalekEXTERMINATE 02:00, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
All is forgiven. Punky Your mental puke relief 02:01, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

how long[edit]

do you have to be a Rationalwikian to be a bureaucrat--Thedoctor80 (talk) 17:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Long enough. Scarlet A.pngd hominem 17:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
It's not length that matters; it's how you use it. -- Nx / talk 17:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
SCHWING!!!!! Scarlet A.pngd hominem 17:49, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Will I be a bureaucrat soon? Colbert|FanI am a Marxist... I follow the teachings of the Marx brothers 07:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Not likely. ТyTalk. 12:07, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Why?[edit]

Did we eliminate the bureaucracy? RoninMacbeth (talk) 23:20, 22 September 2017 (UTC)