User talk:ColbertFan

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

"Anonymous User", you're not fooling anyone. I've responded to your concerns and answered your questions and I haven't seen a single insight from you yet, so anyone with an open mind can see that you're trying to spread anti-Christian propaganda. I urge you, I beseech you, I beg you: accept that chivalry was and is an ideal for all to strive for. It is very effective in reducing and eliminating friction, insults, hard-feelings, and accidents, not to mention that it reduces moral decay. As I've said before, the more atheistic one is, the more he views government as the church, and officials in government as rulers. We have a preference for substance over talk. Insistence on last wordism in violation of our rules, without contributing substance to this encyclopedia, could result in account blocking.--aschlafly 21:37, 22 March 2023 (UTC)

New logo large.png Welcome to RationalWiki, ColbertFan!

Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards!

Tell us how you found RationalWiki here!

If you are interested in contributing:

ТyTalk. 19:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


There is no "vote" namespace, so pages prefixed "vote" will appear in the mainspace. Cheers! Blue Talk 22:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, knowing is half the battle. GI-JOE®! Colbert|FanThis sig is so outdated 22:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)


It is my great pleasure to inform you that you have been demoted to the lowly rank of sysop. Here's your guide, feel free to ask about anything! Blue Talk

Thanks, I lost it via the Block War of 2011. I will only ask for it back AFTER the Block War of 2011, Thanks :) DickTurpis (talk) 00:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I want my sysop status back! Also, great video. I think who ever made it was a pacifist, but still it was funny. Colbert|FanThis sig is so outdated 03:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
And the problem with being a pacifist is? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Nothing, I just don't agree with them. However, one of my friends is a pacifist. I think, however, that the only excuse for violence to stop other peoples violence. Colbert|FanThis sig is so outdated 02:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
HUG A DALEK TODAY Totnesmartin (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I hugged a dalek and I died. Hey, Dalek want to join the Dead Club(aka heaven)? You are pacifist and thus you want to kill yourself(because a pacifist is someone who wants to kill him or herself for being a pacifist, right?). Colbert|FanThis sig is so outdated 18:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
I think we need a "Don't Feed the ColbertFan" template. Blue Talk 20:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Start a new discussion


Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Hey000:51, 21 October 2011
Vandalism302:54, 24 April 2011
Move102:33, 15 March 2011
Colors222:41, 14 March 2011
No offence...2802:51, 14 March 2011
Category:You501:12, 14 March 2011
CUR120:23, 13 March 2011
Trying too hard819:54, 12 March 2011
Help1420:23, 11 March 2011
Dude1322:23, 10 March 2011
Hello022:26, 9 March 2011

You were annoying but at least you were somewhat funny! And you did have the "only a kid" excuse. Look us up in a bit!

Tytalk00:51, 21 October 2011

Please stop advertising your moronic CP vandalism. That's not what RW is about and your efforts make the whole site look stupid.

Scream!! (talk)23:24, 23 April 2011

I endorse this product and/or service.

- π23:26, 23 April 2011

Seriously. You're 3-4 years late to the party on this one. It's not who we are anymore, and it's not what this site is about. Beyond that, vandalizing websites is a bad idea in general, and trying to mess with mean-spirited, vindictive, petty people like Rob, Karajou and JPatt could have real-world consequences. As I understand it, you're just a kid, right? You really do not want your mom getting a call at work from the Internet saying her boy has been engaged in that kind of nonsense. I wouldn't put that sort of thing past these guys.

P-Foster (talk)23:48, 23 April 2011

As in further conversation, not the whole bloody thread!

ТyTalk.02:30, 15 March 2011

[1] here you go

ТyTalk.22:26, 14 March 2011

Now I don't have to always have to google something like "red color hex". Thanks, I will bookmark it.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz22:27, 14 March 2011

No offence... but an organised block war just seems a bit lame :\

Also, the Confederate States of America were racist. If you'd like to argue otherwise, please begin by refuting Alexander H. Stephens' length speech at the founding of the Confederation:

"Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth."

If I were taking part in the founding of a new state, which I believed not to be racist, and the new Vice President spoke these words, not only would I be disgusted, but I'd probably have heckled him. In fact, the enormous non-racist crowd, from the population of this non-racist state, would probably have all heckled him.

DalekEXTERMINATE00:02, 13 March 2011

I never said the PEOPLE weren't racist, also an organised block war is better than organised religion.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz00:05, 13 March 2011

So: - You accept that the Vice President of the CSA said that the state was founded on the principle that one race is superior to another. - You do not deny racism among the population of the CSA? - You accept that the CSA would rather fight a bloody war than give up slavery; but claim that they were not racist?

By these standards, what possibly could be a racist state? Could a racist state exist, if this were not one? Surely, Apartheid South Africa was racist, with whites legally seen as superior to blacks? Well what if the whites OWNED the blacks? Would that be racist?

DalekEXTERMINATE00:13, 13 March 2011

Also the CSA's constitution specifically gave people the right to keep slaves - and only Negro ones at that.

- π00:17, 13 March 2011

How is that a nation state (the CSA) the founding documents of which entrench the right of members of one racial group to own members of another (and not vice versa) can be viewed as anything other than racist?

MtD (talk)01:12, 13 March 2011

Our friend here appears to be under the delusion that the CSA was founded on the noble philosophical principle of states' rights, which was of course completely separate from slavery and racism.

Blue Talk03:33, 13 March 2011

"which was of course completely separate from slavery and racism." --Blue Talk

I didn't say it was SEPERATE from slavery and racism, what I mean by "Nor do I believe the Confederacy was racist" means that I don't believe that is mainly founded on slavery. I know that it WAS a racist state, however, so was the US when it was founded(most of the founding fathers owned slaves) and we don't say the US was founded on slavery.

Putting people to high standards and then saying to supporters of a view "SEE!" is a bad arguing method.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz03:42, 13 March 2011
Edited by author.
Last edit: 03:48, 13 March 2011

Well if you know the Confederacy was a racist state, why do you have Nor do I think the Confederacy was racist. on your userpage?

Updated to say, don't you think you should qualify Nor do I think the Confederacy was racist. to represent what you really think?

MtD (talk)03:46, 13 March 2011

Miswording, I will change it to Nor do I think the Confederacy was MAINLY racist. Okay, MtD.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz03:47, 13 March 2011

Please, since you've spent so much effort describing what you don't think, tell us clearly what you do think.

Blue Talk03:49, 13 March 2011
  • The Confederacy was founded mainly on states' rights
  • Abe didn't care about slavery as much as people think he did
  • The Union at that time could be easily compared to the Great Britain under King George III with regards to secession movements.
Colbert|FanFor the LuLz03:53, 13 March 2011

Categories affect the rest of the wiki. Nonetheless, it is good to have a spare CUR. I challenge you to debate me on the subject of cats.

Mei III (talk)20:28, 13 March 2011

You mean categories. I just want to have a category for my userpage and subpages of my userpage. Colbert|FanAyn Rand is a Marxist! 20:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz20:30, 13 March 2011

I meant cats. It was a reference to CUR. He and I debated cats. It was a golden age.

Mei III (talk)20:33, 13 March 2011

Okay, cats are better than dogs.

Dogs bark a lot, trust me I know. Kitties are cute and cuddly and don't bark! Colbert|Fan ... of libertarians? 20:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz20:34, 13 March 2011

Dogs are better than cats. Dogs never bark. Kitties are incredibly dangerous (like sharks). I hate you.

This is just like the old days.

Mei III (talk)20:41, 13 March 2011

I "hate" you too, isn't hating people fun and moral and has NO problems. PROVE ME WRONG! Colbert|FanThis is a sentence. 01:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz01:12, 14 March 2011

Trying too hard

You are.

ТyTalk.19:01, 12 March 2011

For what, what goal how am I doing it? Why are you talking to be about it without good information?

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz19:03, 12 March 2011

You are trying too hard to fit in, and this irritates people. Take it slow, let the community grow on you. And for the record, block wars are haphazard, spur of the moment things.

ТyTalk.19:06, 12 March 2011

I am not trying, I am just trying to have a chat maybe drink a root beers along the way.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz19:08, 12 March 2011

Whatever, just remember that the stuff in the glass bottles is way better that the stuff in a can. Cheers.

ТyTalk.19:09, 12 March 2011

It is possible to fit in? Thorvelden (talk)

Thorvelden (talk)19:52, 12 March 2011

What do you need help with?

ТyTalk.02:16, 9 March 2011

Lots of things. I need help NOT going to college(I am in my early teens, by the way).

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz05:34, 9 March 2011

That you were in your early teens was readily apparent.

As to not going to college, my best advice would be to not apply to college, or draw penises all over the applications or something.

Blue Talk05:39, 9 March 2011

"That you were in your early teens was readily apparent."-Blue

What about me gave that away, my newbieness. That has nothing to do with my age.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz05:41, 9 March 2011

The way you write. You could have been an octogenarian or a tween, and statistically it was probably the latter.

Blue Talk05:44, 9 March 2011

First, I researched tween and found out I was wrong. I thought I was an early teen, but I am tween! Sorry about that :) Now, tween powers activate!

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz05:46, 9 March 2011

Oh, come now; when today's octogenarians were in school the academic standards were still such that students were taught some semblance of good grammar.

Mjollnir.svgListenerXTalkerX05:49, 9 March 2011

We are on RW 3.0. Rule of thumb, don't edit debates that haven't been active for a while. Cheers.

ТyTalk.00:27, 10 March 2011

Also, you can edit pages if you feel like it. This is a wiki, if your edits are crap I have teh magic rollback button.

ТyTalk.17:50, 10 March 2011

Same with you (rolls eyes).

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz17:54, 10 March 2011

Just don't be like this guy and I'm sure everything will work out just fine.

ТyTalk.17:57, 10 March 2011
ТyTalk.19:33, 10 March 2011

Yes, the Confederacy was founded over states' rights and NOT racism.

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz19:35, 10 March 2011

What do you want to talk about?

Colbert|FanFor the LuLz22:26, 9 March 2011