User talk:ColbertFan

"Anonymous User" (specialty not in breast cancer), in response to your comment and in explanation of alteration of some of your edits, we don't subscribe to the fallacious view that all languages are equal. I looked at many of your edits before reverting them and your use of "BCE" and "CE" denies historical basis, so I'm confident you're obviously clueless about "modern science". Furthermore, you deny that chivalry deters moral relativism. I repeat: there are no more than 100 successful, performing female pop singers. The FBI would be happy to do something about you.--Aschlafly 01:21, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, ColbertFan! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Тy^Talk. 19:44, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Namespaces

There is no "vote" namespace, so pages prefixed "vote" will appear in the mainspace. Cheers! Blue (pester) 22:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, knowing is half the battle. GI-JOE®! Colbert|Fan^{For the LuLz} 22:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Sir!

It is my great pleasure to inform you that you have been demoted to the lowly rank of sysop. Here's your guide, feel free to ask about anything! Blue (is useful)

Thanks, I lost it via the Block War of 2011. I will only ask for it back AFTER the Block War of 2011, Thanks :)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kh9S1Hk975U DickTurpis (talk) 00:01, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay, I want my sysop status back! Also, great video. I think who ever made it was a pacifist, but still it was funny. Colbert|Fan^{For the LuLz} 03:18, 11 March 2011 (UTC)

And the problem with being a pacifist is? Totnesmartin (talk) 18:13, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Nothing, I just don't agree with them. However, one of my friends is a pacifist. I think, however, that the only excuse for violence to stop other peoples violence. Colbert|Fan^{For the LuLz} 02:41, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

EXTERMINATE PACIFISTS. ^EXTERMINATE 02:43, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

HUG A DALEK TODAY Totnesmartin (talk) 10:06, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I hugged a dalek and I died. Hey, Dalek want to join the Dead Club(aka heaven)? You are pacifist and thus you want to kill yourself(because a pacifist is someone who wants to kill him or herself for being a pacifist, right?). Colbert|Fan^{For the LuLz} 18:22, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

I think we need a "Don't Feed the ColbertFan" template. Blue (is useful) 20:50, 15 March 2011 (UTC)

You were annoying but at least you were somewhat funny! And you did have the "only a kid" excuse. Look us up in a bit!

Please stop advertising your moronic CP vandalism. That's not what RW is about and your efforts make the whole site look stupid.

I endorse this product and/or service.

Seriously. You're 3-4 years late to the party on this one. It's not who we are anymore, and it's not what this site is about. Beyond that, vandalizing websites is a bad idea in general, and trying to mess with mean-spirited, vindictive, petty people like Rob, Karajou and JPatt could have real-world consequences. As I understand it, you're just a kid, right? You really do not want your mom getting a call at work from the Internet saying her boy has been engaged in that kind of nonsense. I wouldn't put that sort of thing past these guys.

I ain't do this any more. Since, I have idea of none.

As in further conversation, not the whole bloody thread!

Will do.

[1] here you go

Now I don't have to always have to google something like "red color hex". Thanks, I will bookmark it.

This is awesome too.

No offence... but an organised block war just seems a bit lame :\

Also, the Confederate States of America were racist. If you'd like to argue otherwise, please begin by refuting Alexander H. Stephens' length speech at the founding of the Confederation:

"Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner- stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth."

If I were taking part in the founding of a new state, which I believed not to be racist, and the new Vice President spoke these words, not only would I be disgusted, but I'd probably have heckled him. In fact, the enormous non-racist crowd, from the population of this non-racist state, would probably have all heckled him.

I never said the PEOPLE weren't racist, also an organised block war is better than organised religion.

So: - You accept that the Vice President of the CSA said that the state was founded on the principle that one race is superior to another. - You do not deny racism among the population of the CSA? - You accept that the CSA would rather fight a bloody war than give up slavery; but claim that they were not racist?

By these standards, what possibly could be a racist state? Could a racist state exist, if this were not one? Surely, Apartheid South Africa was racist, with whites legally seen as superior to blacks? Well what if the whites OWNED the blacks? Would that be racist?

Also the CSA's constitution specifically gave people the right to keep slaves - and only Negro ones at that.

How is that a nation state (the CSA) the founding documents of which entrench the right of members of one racial group to own members of another (and not vice versa) can be viewed as anything other than racist?

Our friend here appears to be under the delusion that the CSA was founded on the noble philosophical principle of states' rights, which was of course completely separate from slavery and racism.

"which was of course completely separate from slavery and racism." --Blue (is useful)

I didn't say it was SEPERATE from slavery and racism, what I mean by "Nor do I believe the Confederacy was racist" means that I don't believe that is mainly founded on slavery. I know that it WAS a racist state, however, so was the US when it was founded(most of the founding fathers owned slaves) and we don't say the US was founded on slavery.

Putting people to high standards and then saying to supporters of a view "SEE!" is a bad arguing method.

Well if you know the Confederacy was a racist state, why do you have Nor do I think the Confederacy was racist. on your userpage?

Updated to say, don't you think you should qualify Nor do I think the Confederacy was racist. to represent what you really think?

Miswording, I will change it to Nor do I think the Confederacy was MAINLY racist. Okay, MtD.

Please, since you've spent so much effort describing what you don't think, tell us clearly what you do think.

• The Confederacy was founded mainly on states' rights
• Abe didn't care about slavery as much as people think he did
• The Union at that time could be easily compared to the Great Britain under King George III with regards to secession movements.

Categories affect the rest of the wiki. Nonetheless, it is good to have a spare CUR. I challenge you to debate me on the subject of cats.

You mean categories. I just want to have a category for my userpage and subpages of my userpage. Colbert|Fan^{The little guy is putting the man down!} 20:30, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

I meant cats. It was a reference to CUR. He and I debated cats. It was a golden age.

Okay, cats are better than dogs.

Dogs bark a lot, trust me I know. Kitties are cute and cuddly and don't bark! Colbert|Fan^{This sig is so outdated} 20:34, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Dogs are better than cats. Dogs never bark. Kitties are incredibly dangerous (like sharks). I hate you.

This is just like the old days.

I "hate" you too, isn't hating people fun and moral and has NO problems. PROVE ME WRONG! Colbert|Fan^{This sig is so outdated} 01:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

this is who CUR was Totnesmartin (talk) 20:19, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Okay.

You are.

For what, what goal how am I doing it? Why are you talking to be about it without good information?

You are trying too hard to fit in, and this irritates people. Take it slow, let the community grow on you. And for the record, block wars are haphazard, spur of the moment things.

I am not trying, I am just trying to have a chat maybe drink a root beers along the way.

Whatever, just remember that the stuff in the glass bottles is way better that the stuff in a can. Cheers.

It is possible to fit in? Thorvelden (talk)

What do you need help with?

Lots of things. I need help NOT going to college(I am in my early teens, by the way).

That you were in your early teens was readily apparent.

As to not going to college, my best advice would be to not apply to college, or draw penises all over the applications or something.

"That you were in your early teens was readily apparent."-Blue

What about me gave that away, my newbieness. That has nothing to do with my age.

The way you write. You could have been an octogenarian or a tween, and statistically it was probably the latter.

First, I researched tween and found out I was wrong. I thought I was an early teen, but I am tween! Sorry about that :) Now, tween powers activate!

Oh, come now; when today's octogenarians were in school the academic standards were still such that students were taught some semblance of good grammar.

We are on RW 3.0. Rule of thumb, don't edit debates that haven't been active for a while. Cheers.

Also, you can edit pages if you feel like it. This is a wiki, if your edits are crap I have teh magic rollback button.

Same with you (rolls eyes).

Just don't be like this guy and I'm sure everything will work out just fine.

Really?

Yes, the Confederacy was founded over states' rights and NOT racism.

What do you want to talk about?