RationalWiki's 2018 Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff — we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

If everyone seeing this today donates $5, we will meet our goal for 2018.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!

Donations so far: $2835Goal: $5000

Talk:Ayn Rand

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Icon philosophy.svg

This Philosophers related article has been awarded SILVER status for quality. We like it, and you should too! See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.


This page is automatically archived by Archivist
Archives for this talk page: <1>, <2>, <3>, <4>, <5>

John Galt vs Che Guevara[edit]

Atlas Shrugged John Galt poster.jpegCheguevararevolution.jpg

The horseshoe theory has a lot to answer for. ŴêâŝêîôîďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 01:57, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Liberals hate one of these people. One was a mass murdering bandit. The other wrote books. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 20:14, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Fuck that noise. I'm not a liberal, I'm a straight up communist, and let me loudly declare that I despise Che Guevara for his crimes. And I also think Ayn Rand is pretty shitty.--"Shut up, Brx." 21:23, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Ah, those pesky Liberals, who all feel exactly the same way about this week's talking point. You sound like Andy Schlafly. SophieWilderModerator 20:27, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
"The Americans speak about (nuclear war) as if they did not know or did not want to accept this fact. I have no doubt they would lose such a war." And who was the POTUS at that time? Osaka Sun (talk) 20:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Wait, Weaseloid, at the risk of lowering your opinion of me even further, I don't get what those images have in commmon, other than maybe being a bit blurry. If you explain it to me, I promise I'll show you this cute video of ferrets I found the other day.--"Shut up, Brx." 21:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
The cap, the commie star, the messianic glow, the inspirational soundbite. WeaseloidWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 22:31, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
Hey Weaseloid would it be possible for you to shrink those images down a bit and put them next to the Communism vs objectvism section on the horsehoe thoery page? I would do it but I'm not very good with images but I still think it would be amusing.ClothCoat (talk) 04:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Done. WẽãšẽĩõĩďWeaselly.jpgMethinks it is a Weasel 07:25, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. ClothCoat (talk) 07:55, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
Well Mr. Shutup, if it's mass murderers you have a problem with then there aren't many people who share your ideology whom you can very well look up to are there? Oh and Sophie, was that addressed at me? --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 14:10, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Why would I need to look up to anyone?--"Shut up, Brx." 16:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

I didn't mean look up to as a superior, I meant look up to as an example or inspiration, a hero if you will. The only heroic Communist I can think of was Nelson Mandella who was heroic in spite of being a Communist rather than because of it. The rest were mass murdering psychopaths. Lenin, Trotsky, Stalin, Castro, Chavez, Guevara of course and of course the world's current leading Communist Kim Jong-un. My personal heroes are Ayn Rand, Oscar Wilde, Winston Churchill and Christopher Hitchens and yes, I know Wilde was a socialist but that's only because he thought it would lead to individualism so he was wrong but for the right reasons and yes Hitchens was a Marxist initially but he saw the error of his ways didn't he. --Let Them Eat Cake (talk) 10:58, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

That synopsis cracked me up.[edit]

This site normally doesn't make me laugh, so thanks to whoever added that. It's hilarious that's actually from the Ayn Rand website. Exiled Encyclopedist (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2014 (UTC)


What kinda racism did she advocate and where? Seems kinda odd to me, I knew she's a crank, but not that kinda of crank.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 21:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC) 21:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

She hated Native Americans... Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 21:54, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Proof. Citation needed. Sure, she said "racism is the lowest form of collectivism" and she absolutely hated collectivism, but I'm sure you have some proof hidden in there somewhere. Or not.
http://www.salon.com/2015/10/14/libertarian_superstar_ayn_rand_defended_genocide_of_savage_native_americans/ https://memegenerator.net/instance/24952363 https://www.pinterest.com/pin/455989530999859237/ Enough? Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:02, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
If you want to listen to her own voice: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EAka-tA5Ojw there you go Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
You've gone beyond your admitted 5 seconds of googling and achieved 10 seconds worth. Very nice sources, showing exactly the opposite of what you want. Which is funny considering that Salon despises her for her economics and therefore after the fact went on a crusade to "prove" that she is racist so that her despised economics could be ignored.
The Salon article made a mistake though. After a whole bunch of decontextualized quotes, they made the mistake of including the speech as a whole. Oh my, she condemned slavery. She did say that she doesn't consider race because she considers the individual, and that is the "wrong" way to be against racism. But she starts it out with saying the writers of the constitution were wrong to tolerate slavery.
I suppose you may think you have a point on the Native American part of the speech. Except she didn't argue for genocide, which is your key point. She argued for property rights. Now her education on native lifestyles was insufficient, but then it was insufficient everywhere the year that speech was made. I suppose we can fault her for not having a 2016 education. Given what she did know, she still didn't advocate genocide, she advocated colonization and property rights.
I congratulate you, that additional 5 seconds of google, doubling your search time, almost found something. (talk) 22:25, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Her speech is almost completely "anti-racism is the real racism" dogwhistle nonsense. By the definition of racist that everyone else uses, she is racist.KrytenKoro (talk) 18:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Good. Are we done here? Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 18:33, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Someone should probably add the links to sources posted here to the article as refs.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 18:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC) 18:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
One can be against slavery and still be a racist. Petey Plane (talk) 18:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)


She described racism as the lowest form of collectivism. And it should not be a mystery here what she thought of collectivism. Show some proof before adding that back.— Unsigned, by: [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] / [[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] / [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]]

She was racist as hell Ayn Rand on arabs: "The Arabs are one of the least developed cultures. They are typically nomads. Their culture is primitive, and they resent Israel because it’s the sole beachhead of modern science and civilization on their continent. When you have civilized men fighting savages, you support the civilized men" ikanreed You probably didn't deserve that 22:00, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hm, yes, she criticized their culture. Obviously she was talking about their genetics. That's okay though, those who desperately want her to be racist in spite of insufficient proof think locking the page constitutes proof. (talk) 22:05, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
You may not use the word racism the way a normal person uses the word racism. To ensure we are talking about the same thing, please give your working definition of racism and an example of a racist statement and/or person. Laurogeita Hamabost (talk) 22:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
I'd bet a fiver that you never see the BON give an example. --Castaigne2 (talk) 16:03, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

She said that and then did the exact opposite.— Unsigned, by: MasterofLogic / talk / contribs

New Fountainhead Adaptation?[edit]

According to this [1] interview with Holywood Reporter, Zack Snyder said he is working on another adaptation of The Fountainhead. Should we mention this? RoninMacbeth (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Mens rea?[edit]

Mens rea is the Latin for 'guilty mind'. I suspect that the phrase mea culpa ('my fault') was what was intended to appear at the end of the Branden discussion. Before I change it, I was just asking if something else was intended. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 16:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

As I understand it, the point of the article saying "mens rea" where it does is that Branden — by apologizing for "contributing to that dreadful atmosphere of intellectual repressiveness that pervades the Objectivist movement" — is giving an admission of guilt, and admitting that this is the case pertaining the 'atmosphere' of Objectivism. As such, I think "mens rea" can be left in the article as-is.
Also, "mea culpa" wouldn't really work, because he's fairly clear that he 'merely' played a part in causing the dreadful atmosphere. As such, he's not conceding that it's his fault. Just admitting that the atmosphere exists today. Which is, really, all that we needed to hear. My two cents. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 20:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)