Talk:Christopedia

Okay, silly question but we'll have to face it as the article has grabbed some attention. WTF do we do with the two Christopedias? ^gnostic 14:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Heh! dunno, which one did you pick up, presumably the http://christopedia.us one? I just googled & picked up the other. Possibly it was the precursor? _and marmite 14:19, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Let that be a lesson to you: include linxes on first edit!. _and marmite 14:21, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I was cut short writing it by getting kicked off the computer I was on. :p Besides, as it was mentioned elsewhere on the wiki I thought people were aware of it. ^gnostic 14:23, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm... I was attracted (repulsed?) by a recent change to an article called 'Race and Intelligence', however, when I went to have a look I noticed a huge number of red links. This woke my spider senses so I looked on WP and, lo and behold, they're word for word. For those interested the links are Wikipedia and Christopedia. Silver Sloth 14:56, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

A lot of work for what is effectively one guy's blog. He can't even keep it up to date. Does RW do this for every crazy asshole's blog? Or just the ones in wiki-form? Neveruse513 14:59, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

I thought we'd decide against doing a numberan article on this. What wrong with just a brief mention in wikis? Totnesmartin 15:53, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

It just got mentioned in the Saloon Bar. Delete if you really want. ^gnostic 16:14, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

My mistake - what got quashed wasn't having an article but CUR's (who else?) idea of us going over there to wandalise it. I'll leave a deletion debate to the mob, we've got worse stuff lying around. Totnesmartin 16:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Shocking!

How could this possibly happen? I demand an inquiry! --Kels 15:09, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Saw that a few days ago or whenever this group was mentioned on RW. I'm proud of little Icewedge, up there in the frozen north making his way on scraps of whale and walrus blubber, tramping through squalls and white-outs to defend the frontiers of liberalism and cudgel racists with an orca pizzlebone and wikicode. Sweet fucker. 70.228.38.134 15:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

This website will be going offline shortly, but it will be back bigger & better than ever!!! ;) I heard Christopedia will soon be relaunching and will be placing a lot less emphasis on racial issues and is gonna be a real force in the Conservative momvement. ^{— Unsigned, by: 149.135.120.249 / talk / contribs}

CUR trashing Christopedia???

Wow, it appears our friend CUR has a blocked vandal account at Christopedia!Lord of the Goons ^{The official spikey-haired skeptical punk} 03:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

I do not think this is news to many of us; I seem to recall that he was tried at one point for dishonoring the Wiki by vandalism on other sites. ListenerX^TalkerX 03:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Oh. I dunno, I wasn't really involved in the community here back in those days. I edited here, but I wasn't really involved in the community as a whole.Gooniepunk2010 ^{Oi! Oi! Oi!} 03:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)

Just wow!

"The Negro is known to have a broad, flat nose, as wide as a gorilla"
"Negroes are the most likely subspecies to commit crimes"
"In South Africa alone, 30,000 babies are raped every year by Negroes"
Crikey o'blimey. These guys should just give up the facade and go to StormFront. Crundy^{Talk nerdy to me} 09:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, this guy, rather than these guys. So far there's known parodist entity Icewedge and that other guy. ^gnostic 15:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Is it gone???

I just thought I'd look and see how much vandalism has replaced articles there, and the [1] site seems to gone. Lord of the Goons ^{The official spikey-haired skeptical punk} 01:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

The domain name licence my have expired. The guy running it didn't seem that committed after a while. A wiki takes off based on whether it can attract contributors or not. Sure lots of people probably read it, but without people making edits to it, it is not really going anywhere. - π 01:35, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

I updated the text to show it's down, possibly for good. ^gnostic 12:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Is it back

So a BoN has updated the article to say that it's back but I'm calling Poe - and not that subtle at that. Bad Faith (talk) 12:00, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Looks like total parody to me.--Bob^{Spring is sprung!} 12:01, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

That's not the white supremacist site the article discusses. Its the obvious parody site of the same name, which is confusing, but the screenshots should show it's not the same thing. ^{d hominem} 12:06, 12 December 2011 (UTC)