Talk:Chuck Norris/Archive1

This is an archive page, last updated 6 October 2021. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:  , (new)(back)

Human is grumpy

Utterly mutilating and editing a CP artile for the Lulz. PS, don't fart on flags! human^{be in} 01:07, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

Sorry dude :-) -AmesG 01:33, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

Hey, I didn't put that header up there! I wasn't grumpy, I was drunk. human^{be in} 14:06, 24 June 2007 (CDT)

Gasp! He found out about our vast atheist conspiracy!

You guys shouldnt say that about the Chuck. He might just show up at your house.

If Chuck Norris wanted to kill us he would have done so allrkhalekrhjkljdjjdhhgc vbnfa hyiohhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

Isn't it funny how many people think that being sick is funny?

"Chuck Norris discovered a new theory of relativity involving multiple universes in which Chuck Norris is even more badass than in this one. When it was discovered by Albert Einstein and made public, Chuck Norris roundhouse-kicked him in the face. We know Albert Einstein today as Stephen Hawking."[1]

Utterly appalling. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 18:50, 4 August 2007 (CDT)

I laughed. --Gulik@work. ( 67.102.192.7 14:21, 20 August 2007 (CDT) )

I also laughed. Because it was funny. Anything offensive, if portrayed in the right way, can be funny and should be laughed at. Also, I don't think I've ever seen spiteful Chuck Norris jokes before. Well done.MertonVsHislop

"Chuck Norris fears no man, unless that man is seeking equal rights for homosexuals." The Foxhole Atheist (talk) 16:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

That is one of the most embarrassing 'jokes' I've ever read or heard. Whoever the author is should be ashamed --Scherben (talk) 17:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

uncyclopedia

Isn't this just a little uncyclopedia? Perhaps we should move to fun?--Bob^{bing up} 08:45, 2 December 2007 (EST)

I've no idea - don't know the guy. It's a vandal target though. Susan^{purrrrr ...} 08:50, 2 December 2007 (EST)

Susan! You don't know who Chuck Norris is? Or do I misunderstand your post?--Bob^{bing up} 09:19, 2 December 2007 (EST)

It must be some other guy she's talking about. That anyone would not know Chuck Norris is a physical impossibility. --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 09:21, 2 December 2007 (EST)

AKjeldsen, you are usually very careful in your use of language; but I don't think that "physical impossibility" is the really the right phrase here. (I must admit that I'm stumped for a better one though.)--Bob^{bing up} 09:30, 2 December 2007 (EST)

Yes, I know. "Logical fallacy"? "Contradiction in terms"? I don't know. But I bet Chuck Norris could tell us! --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 09:33, 2 December 2007 (EST)

He's just another American Psycho - beneath contempt. (I've googled him) I'd be more iclined to vapourise him 'cause he don't seem to be "Fun". Susan^{purrrrr ...} 09:27, 2 December 2007 (EST)

But... but... it's Chuck Norris! *Is shocked beyond belief, and also more than a little afraid that Chuck Norris will come by and roundhouse-kick us all just to make a point.* --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 09:32, 2 December 2007 (EST)

I'm just a provincial Brit! Susan^{purrrrr ...} 09:38, 2 December 2007 (EST)

I'm inclined to go with the Beach boys here. WP:Fun, Fun, Fun --Bob^{bing up} 10:44, 2 December 2007 (EST)

No, he actually belongs in the mainspace, believe it or not. He's a politically active chump, and blogs at one of those crazy sites we watch once in a while. Endorsed some GOP douchebag for president and it was actually news, that sort of thing. human 15:05, 2 December 2007 (EST)

I agree with the above, but should the CN Facts part of the article be moved to Fun? weaseLOId~ 17:19, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

I see no reason to. That sort of thing is part of what makes RW a good read. ħuman 19:27, 29 August 2008 (EDT)

Oh Chuck...

Anyone notice everybody loved him till he went insane? --Gen. S.T. Shrink *^{Get to the bunker}* 02:04, 19 May 2008 (EDT)

Is Chuck Norris advocating desecration of the American flag?

Bein' a Brit I only know about this gentleman from the web but came upon this recently. ^{I am eating} _& honey^chat 00:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Isn't it in the article? ħuman 04:32, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

He could dye his weave with the 'red, white and blue'? --Scherben (talk) 17:06, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

Hatchet job

Yet another hatchet job of a great man. Talsley (talk) 17:44, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

You do know the article is about Chuck Norris?--Bob^{"What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence."} 21:09, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes. Talsley (talk) 00:07, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

We're messing with the wrong guy. Look at what happened to these dudes. That could very easily be us. ₩€₳$€£ΘĪÐ^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 00:13, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

The weblink is to YouTube. Talsley (talk) 00:16, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

How is it a hatchet job? Norris isn't that good of an actor, and seems to be a bit of a dick in real life. --Revolverman (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Norris is an excellent writer and a superb actor. Talsley (talk) 00:31, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

I diagree entirely about the actor part. I've never read any of his writings. He only plays one archatype. (ex)Spec-op all American. Not saying moves like the Delta Force or Invasion USA arn't fun to watch, but they are not great works. --Revolverman (talk) 00:37, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Sadly, on of the few memories I have of my great grandmother is having to sit at her brownstone watching a marathon of Walker, Texas Ranger. And it was shit. Copperhead^Hisssssss 00:45, 28 April 2012 (UTC)