Talk:Complicity

wtf

I've seen some coathanger articles in my time, but this takes the cake. Move it to Cambodia. Whoops, we don't even have that article yet! You could write it, y'know - David Gerard (talk) 15:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Here's why it isn't a coathanger article. In no subject area is complicity more evaded than in questions of responsibility for genocide. The emotion driven desire for a simple narrative about profound wrongdoing often results in simplistic master narratives than let other responsible parties escape recognition. Thorvelden (talk)

Here's why it's a coathanger article: it's >90% a rant on a single topic that isn't actually the title. Make it an article or move it to essay space - David Gerard (talk) 18:43, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

OK. You win. Thorvelden (talk)

This can be moved to Cambodia now. zieber (talk) 16:38, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Expansion

Rather than merge it, I propose we expand it to encompass other genocides, and various faults of consumerism (ie, the developed world is quite comfortable with developing nations suffering so long as we get our cheap t-shirts.) --TheLateGatsby (talk) 17:59, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Delete

Not even a coat rack any more, but a pointless stub. Sprocket J Cogswell (talk) 01:00, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

+1 - David Gerard (talk) 22:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Agreed. - GrantC (talk) 22:35, 18 January 2014 (UTC)