There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
Talk:Diamond & Silk
Worth addition[edit]
https://mobile.twitter.com/KrangTNelson/status/1012911300291198976 Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 19:26, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
BoN has question[edit]
Why does being against gun control qualify as "Wingnuttery"? — Unsigned, by: 168.99.199.110 / talk
- It's pretty clearly supporting evidence. Not everything needs to be as extreme as backing white nationalists for house elections to help demonstrate a recurring pattern. ikanreed 🐐Bleat at me 21:31, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- That, and, uh, their stance against gun control isn't their only stance. Have you seen the source? Even if they were pro gun control, they'd still be wingnuts for the other positions they hold. Luckily, other wingnuts hold their views, so our work is cut out for us. --It's-a me,
LeftyGreenMario! 22:36, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
- That, and, uh, their stance against gun control isn't their only stance. Have you seen the source? Even if they were pro gun control, they'd still be wingnuts for the other positions they hold. Luckily, other wingnuts hold their views, so our work is cut out for us. --It's-a me,
Question[edit]
Given they are described as Trump fangirls, how (would-be) Mary Sue-ish are they? Anna Livia (talk) 09:57, 18 June 2019 (UTC)