There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
I think we should delete this. I've looked here and on the big wiki, and it seems as if the concept of Mu is just antiquarian woo. I don't see much sign of any modern supporters beyond the occasional kook. If somebody could please point me to some modern Mu-believers or something like that, and expand the article to include this, I'll retract my claim. But as is, I say delete. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
Keep and expand/rewrite
- TyBother me 00:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- It needs more. -- Seth Peck (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- I like the coefficient of friction Sam Tally-ho! 00:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
- If it's woo, it's on-mission, isn't it? RW doesn't have notability standards. Still kinda bare, though.--Filby (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)