Talk:Mu

I think we should delete this. I've looked here and on the big wiki, and it seems as if the concept of Mu is just antiquarian woo. I don't see much sign of any modern supporters beyond the occasional kook. If somebody could please point me to some modern Mu-believers or something like that, and expand the article to include this, I'll retract my claim. But as is, I say delete. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep and expand/rewrite

1. Ty^{Bother me} 00:19, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
2. It needs more. -- Seth Peck (talk) 00:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
3. I like the coefficient of friction Sam ^Tally-ho! 00:25, 20 January 2012 (UTC)
4. If it's woo, it's on-mission, isn't it? RW doesn't have notability standards. Still kinda bare, though.--Filby (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Delete

1. See above. The Heidelberg Kid (talk) 00:17, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Keep

Discordianism#The_KLF They Might be Giants - Cowtown it is kinda a Discordian shibboleth.