Talk:PZ Myers

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Icon evolution.svg

This Evolution related article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

Copperbrain.png
Icon sociology.svg This article contains information about one or more living persons.

Articles about living people must be handled carefully, because they are more open to legal threats.
Reference any contentious allegations solidly; unreferenced allegations should be removed.
If legal threats are raised on this page, please direct the potential litigant to RationalWiki:Legal FAQ; do not interact with them.

Archives for this talk page: , (new)


Let's start again![edit]

I'm sure it'll be lovely now - David Gerard (talk) 21:58, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Atheist Ireland[edit]

For now, removed. FuzzyCatPotato of the Abnormal Universitys (talk/stalk) 22:11, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Ideology[edit]

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2017/03/09/when-ideology-trumps-biology/ Myers prioritizes ideology over science, and evidently edits relevant criticisms in his comments section. Seems relevant. — Unsigned, by: 50.173.132.97 / talk / contribs

Pretty funny that you would cite Jerry Coyne[edit]

Considering RationalWiki makes a good case that Coyne is a political reactionary with his own right-leaning agenda. — Unsigned, by: 2603:7000:2703:74:a532:b6de:e7e2:f94e / talk / contribs

Expunge the dissent, my pretties[edit]

Wow. What a terrible article. PZ is, let's say, a "divisive" character with a declining influence. Atheist Ireland, Brian Dalton, Sam Harris have all said he is better ignored, yet none of that appears in the article.— Unsigned, by: 101.164.13.210 / talk / contribs

Sam Harris has his own character-staining and credibility-breaking problems, as his own entry here can attest. --Luigifan18 (talk) 04:24, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Ideological Privilege Blindness of P.Z. Myers[edit]

"The Absolute Law: I AM THE BOSS, and don’t you forget it. I have sole and absolute power here; I can ban you, I can destroy your comments, I can shut down whole threads. I am a being of caprice; I don’t have to justify anything I do. So when I tell you to stop doing something, stop. Don’t argue with me. You don’t like that I banned your friend? Tough. Don’t complain to me. I will do as I will to make this place the kind of party I want to attend, and that’s all that matters. This law supercedes all other rules." ---P. Z. Myers.............An heroic position for one in no danger whatsoever.Ariel31459 (talk) 15:13, 28 June 2017 (UTC)


P.Z. Myers did not misrepresent Steve Pinker[edit]

On a significantly less savory note, Myers has been accused of misrepresenting the arguments and claims of those he disagrees with. For example, he has apparently attacked a straw man of some of Steven Pinker's commentary.[67]

But congratulations for quoting infamous transphobic grifter Jesse Singal to support your point.

https://www.pinkerite.com/2019/06/steven-pinker-doubles-down-on-blaming.html — Unsigned, by: 2603:7000:2703:74:a532:b6de:e7e2:f94e / talk / contribs