2025 RationalWiki 'Oregon Plan' Fundraiser

There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.

Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with PayPal Logo.png!
Donations so far: $9223.37Goal: $10000

Talk:SJWiki

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
*looks at SJWiki's page on RW* *sees Category:Fallacies* Gee, I wonder who wrote that page? ;) PacWalker 05:27, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Pfft, it's relevant to their mission. FuzzyCatTomato (talk/stalk) 11:51, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
I'm just saying I smelled a somewhat hairy feline tuber's work when I saw it. PacWalker 05:07, 23 April 2015 (UTC)

We oughtta change the “nobody’s voted to keep this yet” in the afd template[edit]

It’s not true that “nobody’s voted to keep this yet”, as I have seen that as of today, 3 people have so far voted to keep it. Just a thought. Fossil evidence of my evolutionCircularREmail2.gifasoningSee my latest prototypes 01:38, 26 November 2018 (UTC)

Gee, that's a lot of people. I guess pedantry has its uses every now and then.--Don Juan (talk) 01:42, 26 November 2018 (UTC)