Question

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Tmtoulouse
Jump to navigation Jump to search

I guess could always add a check mark box option for mods to "prevent unblocking" that gets saved with the block.

Tmtoulouse (talk)06:50, 25 May 2011

That's probably a good idea, otherwise, mods couldn't engage in joke blocks, because then people couldn't unblock themselves.

Eira OMTG! The Goat be Praised.06:51, 25 May 2011
 

Yeah, but that would probably be messy, it would require changing the database schema and hacking MW

-- Nx / talk06:51, 25 May 2011

Maybe add a "mod block" thing to the vandal brake?

Tmtoulouse (talk)06:55, 25 May 2011

Suggestion - why not open an ER in the Mediawiki bug tracker? I think what you are talking about here is an interesting use case, which may be of interest beyond just RW. Even if the Mediawiki developers don't do anything, if you make a change you could always work on getting it upstream (then you won't have to maintain it anymore...)

(((Zack Martin)))07:18, 25 May 2011
 

Ok, here's an idea: If the blocked user's user page is protected at the mod level, their block can only be changed by a mod. It's a hack, but it's pretty easy to implement.

-- Nx / talk07:29, 25 May 2011

Dammit, there's no hook for unblocking, so I can prevent changing blocks, but not unblocking. I've got to go now, I'll get back to this later.

-- Nx / talk08:58, 25 May 2011

Well shit, I was hoping unblock was treated like a change block....

Tmtoulouse (talk)18:13, 25 May 2011
Edited by author.
Last edit: 20:20, 25 May 2011

Editing MW so that unblock = change block to 0 would solve this, I guess, but may be way too much hassle.

NDSP20:13, 25 May 2011

We don't want to edit MW, maintaining a patch is too much work.

-- Nx / talk20:19, 25 May 2011

Do it properly and you can upstream your patch.

(((Zack Martin)))20:50, 25 May 2011

Been there, done that, getting a simple patch for an actual bug upstreamed takes forever, can't be bothered.

-- Nx / talk04:25, 26 May 2011