User talk:Elassint/Archive3

This is an archive page, last updated 14 April 2010. Please do not make edits to this page.

Archives for this talk page:

<1>, <2>, <4>

, (new)(back)

Yes, you are right, it is a parody. --Seeff 15:43, 14 December 2007 (EST)

uh-oh

This is alarming. Bohdan 17:38, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Whats so alarming? 75.117.237.85 17:43, 13 December 2007 (EST)

He just deleted his user page. Bohdan 17:44, 13 December 2007 (EST)

He does stull like this from time to time. Researcher 17:46, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Um, correction, he does things like this all the time! human 18:23, 13 December 2007 (EST)

• Thanks. Bohdan 20:27, 13 December 2007 (EST)

What happened to the user page? Bohdan 20:50, 13 December 2007 (EST)

I will restore it when i feel like it. IF i feel like it, --Signed by Elassint the Great ^Hi! 20:51, 13 December 2007 (EST)

Why was it deleted? Bohdan 20:53, 13 December 2007 (EST)

'Cause I think it was cool. Elassint deletes cool things. lol. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 00:32, 14 December 2007 (EST)

Know what I did today? I went around to people and told them to "stop what you're doing or I'll shove Greg in your hair". Then they stared calling me Greg. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 00:35, 14 December 2007 (EST)

"Hi Greg"!!!!21!@!11onwe one!@!324eleventeen!@121!@!# human 02:42, 14 December 2007 (EST)

Which one? Me or Greg... I mean, Elassint? --Ryan... ON WHEELS!!!!!! 03:40, 14 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks...

Man, I'll be ain't nobody with me down in that lower-left corner like that. PFoster 16:42, 14 December 2007 (EST)

Did you actually read the whole thing that fast?

Cause, if so, I'm impressed. (And thanks for fixing that, by the way.) Researcher 17:01, 14 December 2007 (EST)

No, i just found the spelling error. And i'm reading it right now. --Signed by Elassint the Great ^Hi!`

OK. Still, thanks. Researcher 17:05, 14 December 2007 (EST)

NWO

"I know you are going to hate me for this, but i actually thing this is a better version. I really do"

We're not gonna hate you for additions - and alterations... but I am concerned about the deletions? human 01:15, 15 December 2007 (EST)

Liberapedia

Still on Liberapedia? --HalifaxTroll 18:55, 16 December 2007 (EST)

Im an admin there. If im not on Liberapedia then i am not online. --Signed by Elassint the Great ^Hi! 19:00, 16 December 2007 (EST)

Main Page

Hello, can you unlock the main page so I can work on even funnier vandalisim? --Closer government 09:27, 17 December 2007 (EST)

Metapedia

Why not just delete the Metapedia article? As for its "racism", most people appear to see that even without help from you morons. 44x2 19:52, 17 December 2007 (EST)

Take it to Talk:Metapedia. --Signed by Elassint the Great ^Hi! 19:57, 17 December 2007 (EST)

junk pages

please do not delete, you're messing up my tests. human 20:10, 17 December 2007 (EST)

It would have worked better if I knew you were "helping". Did a version with the "plainlinks" tag ever work right? And are you gonna delete 'Jiu0978y0786786tr7658r765er476d' and '9rs9 dff cvn nn n nnnnnnnnnn m,,, ;' or shall I?

Yes it did. --Signed by Elassint the Great ^Hi! 20:31, 17 December 2007 (EST)

So…

Any interest in a free potentially ir-RationalBlog? --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 16:50, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Ah, come on…

…don't retire… --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 20:24, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Oh, wait, is he seriously leaving? I thought it was a joke. Don't go. I'll harass you on Liberapedia until you come back. Г☭длессЛиберал 20:26, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Is he leaving? I don't know anything more about it than you do. --Linus^{(plot evil tech)} 20:29, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Oh, okay. I just saw the 'retired' message on his page, and it was an IP who posted it, so I assumed it to be pwnage. Г☭длессЛиберал 20:31, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Elassint is still busily editing, so I suspect it was typical 'parasite of Elassint' wandalprankage. human 21:18, 21 December 2007 (EST)

He wouldn't retire unless I stopped shouting at him for retiring. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 22:47, 21 December 2007 (EST)

Global Warming Conspiracy

Any reason why you took all the lulz - and a lot of the bite - out of the article? PFoster 15:38, 22 December 2007 (EST)

That is a good question. I have reverted again.--Bob^{bing up} 15:50, 22 December 2007 (EST)

I just significantly altered the Main Page, and you all are in a pissing contest about a Global Warming Conspiracy that doesn't exist anyways? Go a enjoy the beauteous view! --Wandalise me Bohdan! RA ^{talk stalk}_{Over 270 edits!} 15:58, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Hey RA, I commented on your mainpage change which I thought was quite good.--Bob^{bing up} 17:53, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Sysop

If this user has permanently retired and is not Leaving and never coming back then should we desysop?--Bob^{bing up} 17:53, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Since we don't know if he has really retired, that would be unfair, I think? He may want to spend xmas away from wikis, for instance, and plan on unblocking hisself in a few days. Of course, we can't tell what he plans. Alternatively, we could desysop and unblock. I suppose it doesn't make sense to have a "retired" sysop (though I suspect stevo might still be one!). human 18:56, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Well, I thought that the purpose of the retired template which he put on his page was to announce that he was "really" retired. Otherwise it would seem a bit pointless to put it on.--Bob^{bing up} 19:32, 22 December 2007 (EST)

He has retired because "everyone would hate him". It is not a joke retire as far as I know. We both talked about our retirements on IRC. I would however ask you not to desysop him as he may not really be retired. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 19:36, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Thanks for the clarifications, Ryan! human 19:50, 22 December 2007 (EST)

Clarification? Is he retired or not? You say it's not a joke, and he's put a "Retired" template up with a redirect to liberapedia, all of which looks pretty retired to me - yet you say "he may not really be retired". This looks like a pretty classic case of Leaving and never coming back but with the added twist of "Yes, but I may not really be leaving".--Bob^{bing up} 14:01, 23 December 2007 (EST)

Haha, well, it seemed "clear" to me at the time! I suppose "clearer" makes more sense. Bob, why don't you unblock him and have a 'crat desysop him for the time being? If he comes back we can always make him a janitor again. human 15:13, 23 December 2007 (EST)

OK.--Bob^{bing up} 16:16, 23 December 2007 (EST)

He appears to be back, should he be re-sysopped? --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 23:14, 26 December 2007 (EST)

Why? Let him revert his puppets vandalism without being able to block them for the coup de grace! human 02:02, 27 December 2007 (EST)

Eh? Well he earned them in the first place... I think. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 02:30, 27 December 2007 (EST)

New World Order

Elassint, really, come on - give it a rest. PFoster 17:01, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Yes, please. Try to avoid being blocked for making the same two or three edits over and over against the endless reversion by the mob. human 20:51, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Come on, stop worrying about this and GIVE HIM BACK HIS SYSOP RIGHTS AND HE MIGHT STOP IT, or at least I'll make him. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 20:53, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Come on, don't make me block you both. Don't liberapedia or rationalwikiwikiwikiwiki need your fervent improvements? human 20:59, 2 January 2008 (EST)

This wiki does not negotiate with terrorists. Godspeed! --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 21:05, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Excuse me? Are you calling me a terrorist? --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 21:22, 2 January 2008 (EST)

No, just a loser with zero life... human 22:56, 2 January 2008 (EST)

Actually the demand "GIVE HIM BACK HIS SYSOP RIGHTS AND HE MIGHT STOP IT", would seem to be a good reason for not giving them back.--Bob^{bing up} 03:11, 3 January 2008 (EST)

How so? ~ Elassint ^Hi! 05:56, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Because it's an implicit threat. Make Elassint a sysop or he'll continue disruptive edit warring. We obviously wouldn't give sysop powers to someone who threatened to disrupt our site unless they were given those powers.--Bob^{bing up} 13:16, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Human, I actually have a life, and quite a good life at that. PLlease don't start with the insults. --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 03:32, 3 January 2008 (EST)

(undent)
Heh! (immature idiot) No other insult(?) necessary. Susan^{purrrrr ...} 03:37, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Just fucking stop with the insults, EVERYONE, you really all need to treat me like a freking conservative don't you? -_- Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 03:47, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Heh! Heh! Heh! Heh! Heh! Heh! Susan^{miaow ...} 03:56, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Yes, absolutely hilarious. Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 04:14, 3 January 2008 (EST)

OK, why do you all hate me? --~ Elassint ^Hi! 05:56, 3 January 2008 (EST)

And why are you insulting Ryan so much? Are these insults supposed to be directed at me? --~ Elassint ^Hi! 06:02, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Partners in grime. You both packed up your bags and said "never coming back" but then returned. Elassint may have "earned" his sysop rights before but he then abused them; however, most of us tolerated it despite it being annoying and a pain in the ass. So having left he was no longer an editor of good standing and therefore has no entitlement to restitution of his former powers/duties. I think you guys ought to decide whether you actually want to be a sensible part of RW or just want to piss about. And by sensible I mean engaging in constructive dialogue. Not everyone agrees with each other here but we usually manage to come to an mutually acceptable form of words when there is a difference, rather than engaging in edit warring. If you want to persist with annoying unfunny vandalism then go ahead but do expect ever increasing blocks. I rather wonder why you've both come back, are your other projects not getting enough attention? We have quite a few young editors here who exhibit exceptional maturity (most of the time) it's up to you whether you want to be like them. Genghis ^Marauding 06:45, 3 January 2008 (EST)

OK, and not to sound to demanding, but when did I ever abuse my sysop powa? ^{— Unsigned, by: Elassint / talk / contribs}

Sorry, I meant position rather than power, but you reverted one of my vandal blocks and never gave me a satisfactory explanation other than saying it was a mistake by Ryan. Genghis ^Marauding 07:21, 3 January 2008 (EST)

It was a mistake by Ryan, he had logged in to the vandal account using the password that was in the username and got himself autoblocked. So, when did i abuse my sysop position? --~ Elassint ^Hi! 07:36, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Think Genghis said it all Elassint, now just go away & come back when you've grown up. Susan^{miaow ...} 07:16, 3 January 2008 (EST)

SusanG, come on, I'm sure you have the ability to be nice to people, USE THAT ABILITY! --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 20:10, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Cabal

Do you want to join the ratwiki cabal? user talk:Bohdan 13:31, 3 January 2008 (EST)

Vandals at Liberapedia

Title says it all really --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 22:01, 9 January 2008 (EST)

Thanx

Twas growing boring. Susan^Purrrrrrr 14:05, 13 January 2008 (EST)

Oh Greg

Why retire? --Cheers, ♦ Ryan ♦ ♦ ^{ǂ wuz here ǂ} 01:27, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Template:Box

Would you mind terribly documenting the abovementioned template?

Thankies... human 12:32, 20 January 2008 (EST)

Or even documenting it well, for that matter? human 13:01, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Aw

I miss you! COME BACK!!!! -- kjm.rt  05:29, 3 February 2008 (EST)

Thanks

Thanks for removing those categories, I was just meaning to do that myself. Pinto's5150 ^Talk 00:27, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

hellooooooo

Is you back? --Mitch^?!?! 02:50, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Looks like it. Why do you care? -- Ryan T. / gggg? 02:51, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Just wondering why he was editing when he had a "retired" template on his page. --Mitch^?!?! 02:52, 18 March 2008 (EDT)

Okay! *goes back into retirement* -- Ryan T. / gggg? 02:53, 18 March 2008 (EDT)