User talk:KJ24

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Desudesudesudesudesudesudesudesu Hello, I don't know if you've got the wrong idea about us, but this website isn't an encyclopedia. I've had to delete your articles about roads. BicyclewheelModerator 09:05, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

What the bicycle wheeler dealer said, and hence why your railway station article was axed. ScepticWombat (talk) 08:24, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
If they weren't clear: stop with the articles on roads. Do not want. PacWalker 05:40, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

You obviously don't know what you're doing here ...[edit]

So I'm placing you in the vandal bin. You may now create one mess of an article every half hour. Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 04:00, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

A warning[edit]

You've been told repeatedly that we are not an encyclopedia and do not want all these articles on highways etc. etc. If you continue creating pages without relevance to our mission, someone's going to start applying blocks. PacWalker 06:08, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

You have been warned. You're now blocked. Spud (talk) 08:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)

Get me out of here![edit]

This is so-o-o-o stupid. I wish I could write for RationalWiki. KJ24 (talk) 03:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Stop it. You're the most boring troll we've ever had. Where's Marcus Cicero or Bohdan when you need them? Peace. AgingHippie (talk) 03:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
If you want to create pages for your highways so desperately, why not create you own website? With blackjack, and hookers. CorruptUser (talk) 04:10, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
Why the latter?[1] I don't know. Anyway, unblock me, and I will like it. KJ24 (talk) 22:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm sure you would. WalkerWalkerWalker 22:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

You mean [1] and [2]? (talk) 18:14, 15 June 2015 (UTC)

  1. Or the former.


ђåŷ®ëßãỹç KJ24 (talk) 04:19, 17 October 2015 (UTC)