You can mix ordered and un-ordered lists like this (look at the code):
- Item 1
- Item 2
- Item 3
@ZooGuard : Thanks for your feedback. I am new here and have not yet gotten the hang of editing pages. I have fixed the formatting - check and see if its ok. I rewrote and expanded the Tactics section as a list, because the way in which Craig debates makes almost everything he says seem plausible, and I had to watch a lot of his debates to pick up on his bullshit. I just feel that having an ordered list in your head while reading his work or listening to him allows you to detect his baloney in realtime. Do you want it to be in a monograph format?Madscientistjaidev (talk) 12:41, 7 May 2012 (UTC)
- Probably something like "technocrat", though that's a label usually applied by other people.--ZooGuard (talk) 09:22, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
Yes, Technocrat is part of it. But it goes beyond just politics, and extends to our very way of life.
Madscientistjaidev (talk) 09:57, 26 May 2012 (UTC)
- Interesting. During the last Australian federal elections there was a party that wanted to implement an online system where every Australian (with an internet connection) could vote on every piece of legislation presented to parliament; seems to me like there should be limits to allowing people to influence the outcome of complex pieces of legislation. Does that make me a fascist?
- Anyway I, for one, welcome our shiny metal venusian overlords, let's hope they get Isaac Assimov to code the resource allocation robot though. Tielec01 (talk) 04:44, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Me Gusta!!! Madscientistjaidev (talk) 06:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)