User talk:Nobullman

What is going on? World Blogs Clogs Elections The Bar (talk) (talk) (talk) (talk) (hic) Welcome to RationalWiki, Nobullman! Check out our guide for newcomers and our community standards! Tell us how you found RationalWiki here! If you are interested in contributing: Read what our articles are intended to be Check out the to-do list See our help page and Wikipedia's formatting cheatsheet If writing a new article, consider writing up a draft And most importantly: Pull up a goat and have some fun!

Hi there! Welcome to the bomb of the internet! The Goonie 1 ^{What's this button do? Uh oh....} 04:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Are you interested in having an effect on the homotoxicology article? I can help you figure out how to have your say, but rewriting an article into a fantasy piece isn't going to work. Etaroced (talk) 05:45, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

sure i really want to change that article because and i can do it using actual quotes from the articles he used as ref. I really think that this is more about defamation than anything else. I work for Heel and am willing to demonstrate that that article is biased beyond belief, you can disagree with something and use your own sources to do so that is fine but using the text from a COMPANY WEB SITE and twisting it around just to disagree is not right. Please look at the links and ref used in the text they are directly contradicting the points being made. This was poorly done and it is just bashing a company that truly helps millions of people worldwide It is 1 am here and I am doing this for free just because I find it really unjust.

Best Regards,

Alexandre Morin

The trick is, everyone is doing this for free on this site. I am not going to argue your points, yet, but rather impart some information to you that you may find helpful if you truly want to engage the content of the article. Start on the talk page, no the article. I would start with information you would want included, or specific wording you wanted changed. Start small, make your argument, site your sources, and see what people respond with. Keep in mind that you are dealing with a community of individuals that do not believe that homeopathy is valid, and that it has failed to meet basic standards of scientific testing. It is also a community that has a lot of intelligent individuals (as well as professionals in various relevant fields) that know how to review sources, and have high standards for validity. It will be a difficult road to climb but you will have a fair hearing for as long as you wish to pursue it.

Another important thing is that this is a wiki and the more you know about the wiki and editing patterns and culture the better off you will be. Start by looking at our Help:Contents. As a first tip when you are done you sign your posts with ~~~~ and it will automatically use those four tilda to put your name and a date stamp. Good luck. Etaroced (talk) 06:27, 29 January 2010 (UTC)