User talk:Wang

Your welcome to RationalWiki is lukewarm at best, Wang. This observation is due to the nature of your initial edits. Pull up a goat and try not to make trouble. We realize it is possible that you do not understand the nature of the site or our objectives. Please see our guide for newcomers and our community standards to clarify things for you. If you're still interested in contributing, please see what our articles are intended to be.

☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 14:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

I understand objective is Baizuo objective. ^{— Unsigned, by: Wang / talk / contribs}

On talk pages, please sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking on the sign button: on the toolbar above the edit panel. You can also indent successive talk page comments using one more colon (:) for each line. Thank you. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 14:44, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Language problem?

Judging by your edits English isn't your first language Wang. If you tell us on the talk page what you mean or intend then someone else could edit (or not) the article.Scream!! (talk) 15:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Baizuo fake hypocrite pretend not understand. Article only mention bad thing own people. China not care call name. China do anything Baizuo only attack own people. Great pity and shame. Your future is destroy. Wang (talk) 15:24, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

ah: "Baizuo (/ˈbaɪˌtswɔː/;[1] Chinese: 白左 báizuǒ, literally "white left"[2]) is a derogatory Chinese neologism used to refer to Western leftist liberal elites.[3][4][5] It refers to the left faction in the culture wars in Western politics,[original research?] implying support of multiculturalism, political correctness and positive discrimination. In more than 400 answers submitted by Zhihu users during 2015 to May 2017, the term is defined as referring to those who are hypocritically obsessed with political correctness in order to satisfy their own feeling of moral superiority motivated from an ignorant and arrogant Western-centric worldview who pity the rest of the world and think they are saviours." (Wiki) I didn't know that but now I see. Scream!! (talk) 15:30, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

@Scream!! So it's basically Chinese for "SJW"? ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 16:14, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

So how did we get a Chinese Nationalist here anyway? We have very little content based on Chinese interests. Strange. — Dysk (contribs) 16:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Baizuo. You not normal. All Chinese nationalist. Nationalist is normal. You brain problem. Wang (talk) 16:23, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Dear me, it seems that I have been bamboozled by a sockpuppet (see sections below) Too trusting by half, that's me. Scream!! (talk) 19:58, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

我不喜欢你的话

我说汉语说的很查。 你正在为中国丢脸。请停止。谢谢 ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 16:32, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

错了白左 Wang (talk) 16:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

我不明白。 你说中文马? ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 16:40, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

你好嗎，我叫Commie Lib (talk) 17:17, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

了白左跟SJW一樣嗎 Commie Lib (talk) 17:25, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

马? 白左 Wang (talk) 17:45, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Not a Chinese nationalist, but sock of banned user creating hundreds of accounts here

• https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Wangmeister - same person who was blocked (you know who)

Similar (blocked) socks on Wikipedia where he pretends to be Chinese:

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Zhang500
• User:수학 과학은 거대한 게이입니다

Click those links to see who those are filed under.

The same person was blocked today as User:K._Peters_BSc(Hons) KPeter Bsc (Hons).

There's a word filter now on naming this person, but everyone knows who he is.

I emailed David Gerard today providing proof this same person was Peters.Paycheck (talk) 17:34, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed that too. He used the same crappy universities the racial-Marxist Smith brother went to on his user page bio. Except he wrote that he did an MA in African basket weaving, which is actually more useful than what the Smith did. Boglin Collector (talk) 17:59, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Hey Mike. Still unemployed I see creating RationalWiki socks as part of your split personality disorder or schizophrenia, now pretending to be Chinese. You remind me of Kevin Wendell Crumb. Who will you be tomorrow? A Muslim? Or back to your Antifa/Marxist or Nazi split personas? Aren't you the "racial Marxist"? That's one of your 50 multiple personalities. You're insane.Paycheck (talk) 18:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

...just chiming in to point out that the third Wikiuser is actually in Korean, not Chinese. Also, speaking as someone Korean, it's pretty blatant Google translate. ℕoir LeSable (talk) 19:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

At least this was one of the more amusing personas. — Dysk (contribs) 19:39, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

你不是中國人。你是英國人。

Commie Lib (talk) 19:09, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

是 ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 19:26, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

你說中文嗎？ Commie Lib (talk) 19:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

谷歌说中文，所以我们不会。— Dysk (contribs) 19:48, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

我说汉语说的很查。 我在学着。 And no, I'm not using google translate. I don't even know if everything I wrote is actually right. Also I don't know when to use 汉语 vs 中文 ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 19:54, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Also, I just noticed you used the wrong "ma", Tabula. I don't know what 嗎 means, but the one to make a interrogative statement is 马. ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 20:00, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

No, that's right. It's just the Traditional character rather than the Simplified one. DuceMoosolini^{Your friendly RW dictator moderator} 20:03, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Oh, thanks. I've been learning simplified Chinese. I'd be dead in 30 seconds in Taiwan. ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 20:07, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

My Chinese teacher always taught us Traditional for some reason. Stroke order and characters in general still haunt my nightmares. Commie Lib (talk) 20:16, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

I don't know the difference exactly, but learning Chinese is pretty cool whichever system you use. :) — Dysk (contribs) 20:19, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

Fun Fact, Chinese is one of the few languages that is traditionally read in columns (up to down). There are only one or two other languages (as far as I'm aware) that traditionally use this writing style. ☭Comrade GC☭^{Ministry of Praise} 21:43, 6 March 2019 (UTC)

哈哈哈白左边问马 白左 (talk) 14:31, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

I'm getting the impression that you don't even know how to use google translate right. ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 15:53, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

I thought 马 meant horse? Stefanovich (talk) 19:40, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Depends on the tones. Commie Lib (talk) 19:46, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

No, no it doesn't. Stefanovich (talk) 19:50, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Fuck they're right(but also they're mikey again so ban them in spite of the helpful correction). I forgot the goddamn radical. 吗 not 马. The pronunciation is the same, but meaning is conveyed by the radical. ikanreed ^{🐐Bleat at me} 20:03, 7 March 2019 (UTC)