Protoscience

From RationalWiki
Revision as of 15:08, 11 November 2020 by Asela (talk | contribs) (While the whole article is uncited, the Marxism statement is not something I’ve heard, contradicted the (weak) source, and seemed like a rhetorical exaggeration. Idk tho, so I won’t edit war about it (esp if you have a good source))
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Poetry of reality
Science
Icon science.svg
We must know.
We will know.
A view from the
shoulders of giants.
Warning icon orange.svg This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

Protoscience could use some help. Please research the article's assertions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

Protosciences are fields of study that existed before the modern scientific method was established[note 1] before developing into proper science. They were often concerned as much with occultism or religion as with natural phenomena. Continuing to hold belief in a protoscience that has been discredited in favor of a modern scientific field is considered pseudoscience. In a broader sense, much of science could also fall under the term "protoscience". If a field of study is consistent with existing science, but has not yet been tested rigorously by the scientific method, because it is still in its formative years, then that protoscience (read: not-yet-science) is to be distinguished from pseudoscience (read: never-science). Technically speaking, all science could be a protoscience: you never know if tomorrow, something new will be found which utterly shakes the foundations of science and creates a paradigm shift (kind of like what radium did a century ago).

Examples of past protosciences include:

The theory of hypnotism or "animal magnetism" was, for instance, never developed into a science (although modern neurologists do study hypnosis).

Modern protosciences may or may not include things such as artificial intelligence, ball lightning, quantum computing, string theory, astrobiology and memetics. By definition, we can only speculate on what these will lead to, as future scientific discoveries must be unknown in the present. Stay tuned.

See also

Notes

  1. We can't say for sure when exactly, but a good guess would be 1620 with Francis Bacon's Novum Organum.

References