Brown v. Board of Education

We the People do ordain and establish this US Constitution

Standards of review

Rational basis review Intermediate scrutiny Strict scrutiny

Other legal theories

Substantive due process State action doctrine

Amendments

I - II - III - IV - V - XIV

Defining moments in law

Gonzales v. Carhart Griswold v. Connecticut U.S. v. Virginia Coit v. Green Near v. Minnesota

Interpretation

Originalism Purposive Responsive Textualism

Issues

Civil rights Bill of Rights (United States) Gay rights Commerce rights Free speech v - t - e

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka 347 U.S. 483 Decided: May 17, 1954

Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka was a landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision that ordered racial desegregation of public schools. It was based on the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution, and on social science research that claimed to show that black children have trouble learning unless white children are in the classroom^{[citation needed]}. The ruling overturned the ruling of Plessy v. Ferguson of 1896, which confirmed that racial segregation established in Jim Crow laws was permitted as long as "equal, but separate" accommodations for were provided, when in reality, most facilities for African Americans were not even close to equal or didn't exist at all. The decision led to later decisions requiring racial busing of school children.

Law and social change

It is debatable how much actual desegregation was a result of this ruling and related federal court decisions, as a subsequent ruling ordered states to desegregate "with all deliberate speed" but didn't specify how. This raises interesting questions as to the role of the Supreme Court in bringing about actual social change. Few people today will dispute the need to end the earlier system of segregated schools, and the importance of the decision, but many will query whether it changed that much, or if its use was rather in sending a definitive signal that the days of segregation and institutionalized racism were at a close.

Backlash

U.S. Senator Harry F. Byrd Sr. of Virginia declared "massive resistance to the ruling, and many white politicians throughout the South followed suit, some even going so far as closing public schools entirely rather than allowing for racial integration. This led to President Eisenhower to call out the National Guard to enforce integration in Little Rock, Arkansas, followed by further legal and political battles.

Sadly, the handling of Brown v. Board left a huge space for improvement. While the white schools were required to take in black students, they weren't required to bring in the black teachers as well. Many districts, still in a rage about the whole Supreme Court ruling, did the obvious thing. In just over a decade after Brown v. Board, the number of black teachers would drop by more than half nationwide, a number that included everywhere and not just the Jim Crow areas. This had some further effects that are still being felt today, as even just one black teacher in elementary school is enough to reduce the high school dropout rate of black students by 2/5, as the students are prevented from being alienated.

See also

• Orval Faubus, the Governor of Arkansas who refused to desegregate and ordered the National Guard to stop black kids from entering white schools, sparking a constitutional crisis that forced the fucking President to intervene.
• Thurgood Marshall, who successfully litigated for nationwide desegregation.
• Earl Warren, the Supreme Court Justice who ruled in favor of desegregation.
• Dwight Eisenhower, the President who assumed direct control of the Arkansas National Guard to protect black students in Little Rock, Arkansas, against the wishes of Governor Faubus.
• Civil Rights Cases
• Coit v. Green

References

This law-related article is a stub.
You can help RationalWiki by expanding it.