Information icon.svg Consider taking the RationalWiki Community Survey 2017 or see the results.

Conflict theory

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Join the party!
Icon communism.svg
Opiates for the masses
From each
To each
Not to be confused with conflict thesis.
The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles.
Karl Marx, Communist Manifesto, 1848[1]

Conflict theory is a sociological perspective deriving from Marxism (specifically dialectical materialism) and most closely associated with that philosophy's many variants. It is an abstraction, or generalization, of Karl Marx's idea that "class struggle" was the dominant theme of world history. But what analysis orthodox Marxism limits to class struggles, its derivatives have applied to other social conflicts, so conflict theory has dropped the "class" (in the exclusive sense, anyway) and focused on the "struggle."

Marx believed that conflict was an inevitable part of societies that had not eliminated social class by being organized along "pure communist" lines.[2] All historical change, he asserted, was attributable to class conflict rooted in particular modes of economic production. He saw society as progressing from a primitive society to a slave society to feudalism to capitalism to socialism and finally to the ideal stateless and classless society of pure communism.

Marxists, however, are often criticized for this exclusive focus on class conflict, often ignoring gender, race and ethnic/national inequalities or perceiving them as manifestations of class conflict; for example, orthodox Marxist analysts considered the British conquest of India to be at least somewhat of a positive development as part of the worldwide development of capitalism, thus hastening the day of the International Proletarian Revolution.

This means that schools of thought such as conflict theory are allowed to bring in alternative struggle perspectives (as long as they analyze these struggles as if they were class struggles: if one let ethnic struggles become the dominant theme, well...). Currently fashionable theories involve what are called "interlocking systems of oppression," basically a syncretic attempt to shoehorn every moonbat's pet peeve into one grand unified front against the racist, sexist, anti-Semitic, armed, dangerous, absolutist, white supremacist, male supremacist, political supremacist, economic supremacist, cultural supremacist, military supremacist, homophobic, ageist, ableist, speciesist, phallic, heterosexist, gender-normative, Eurocentric, theocratic international capitalists.[3] More succinctly, it's called "Intersectionality".

See also[edit]


  1. SparkNotes: Introduction and Section 1, Bourgeois and Proletarians (Part 1)
  2. It must be noted that such pure-communist societies have never existed outside Marxists' heads.
  3. All the snarl words you'll ever need, right here.