David Peters

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Style over substance
Pseudoscience
Icon pseudoscience.svg
Popular pseudosciences
Random examples
Warning icon orange.svg This page contains too many unsourced statements and needs to be improved.

David Peters could use some help. Please research this article's assumptions. Whatever is credible should be sourced, and what is not should be removed.

David Peters is essentially what happens when someone tries to be a paleontologist, but the only thing they know how to use is Photoshop and a good deal of spite towards people pointing out why they are wrong. Starting off in a more or less promising career during the 1990s, where he illustrated children's books about prehistoric life, David Peters went off the rail somewhere in the early 2000s, when he published a highly dubious paper on the pterosaur Jeholopterus, which he claimed was a bizarre bipedal creature with frills and a long tail as well as vampiric fangs. A few more deranged illustrations of pterosaurs as mohawk lizards later and it became clear that he was insane.

As of 2012 he began to operate a site called reptileevolution.com. Cropping highly on Google searches, several actual paleontologists have seen fit to warn off onlookers. Plus, it might be full of viruses.[1][2][3]

Why he's infamous[edit]

David Peters simply put disregards functional paleontology. On the best days, he looks at fossil pictures and interprets the squashed remains as accurate. On several occasions he straight up uses Photoshop and makes up drawings. Combined with his surreal choice for colour markers, this results in frankly creepy diatribes on things that aren't there.

As noted above, he is infamous for his depictions of pterosaurs as aberrant bipedal creatures with back frills and erect tails. He disregards several studies in recent years demonstrating pterosaurs to be quadrupedal, furry flyers in favour of bird-lizard hybrids.

His phylogenetic work leaves a lot to be desired as well. He has build what he calls the "large reptile tree", which is basically the result of ignoring all types of established synapomorphies in favour of randomly pairing things together.

Starting with the comments section on the Tetrapod Zoology article, his behaviour is noted as being more erratic and unpleasant, which has not endeared him to the paleontological community at large.[citation needed]

Mammals[edit]

As of 2016 Peters appears to have started focusing more on mammals over his preferred reptiles, possibly in response to a speculative post on volaticothere eutriconodonts.[4] The results are just a wacky, not in the least because they're all defined in relation to hippos:

  • Mammals are closely related to archosaurs.
  • Hyaenodon is closely related to the thylacine.
  • Volaticotherium is a marsupial (note: one of the earliest explorations into the mammal realm, lending credence to the above speculation).

See also[edit]

External links[edit]

References[edit]