Draft:Olaf Scholz

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Information icon.svg This is a draft that anyone is free to edit as they would a mainspace page.

Do not add categories to draft pages; use {{draft categories}} instead for a view.

Contributors should nominate draft articles for deletion only if they believe that the article is not applicable to RationalWiki's mission.

Articles involving living persons must conform to our guidelines on biographies of living people.

Has anyone seen this guy? He went missing as soon as he was sworn into office. Please report any sightings to the police immediately.
Oh no, they're talking about
Politics
Icon politics.svg
Theory
Practice
Philosophies
Terms
As usual
Country sections
United States politics British politics Canadian politics Chinese politics French politics German politics Indian politics Iranian politics Israeli politics Japanese politics South Korean politics Turkish politics

Olaf Scholz (19 June 1958–) is the current chancelor of Germany. Well, noone really knows, many are still looking for Angela Merkel and Olaf isn't exactly the spotlight kind of guy, but he was indeed sworn in as Chancellor of Germany on December 8, 2021 after forming an uneasy coalition with the Greens (Environmentalism, Social Liberalism) and the FDP (Classical Liberalism) to kick the CDU/CSU (Christian democracy, Conservatism) into the opposition - after 16 years.

Scholz's governing style can be described as evasive. He is known for his ability to give long-winded answers to confrontational questions that contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, his tendency to make verbal commitments but to never actually pull through with them, and his suspicious knack for "forgetting" significant details about his potentially criminal past as a mayor of Hamburg.

Scandals[edit]

Cum ex[edit]

Torture[edit]

As mayor of Hamburg, Scholz passed a law that ordered the police to give people vomit pills if they think that someone took drugs. 2 people died because of this law. The german supreme court prohibited this practice because:

1.It's torture

2.It violates the prosumption of innocence