Essay talk:Vandalizing Conservapedia

Despite the tone of this essay, RationalWiki does not condone or support vandalizing other websites, including but not limited to Conservapedia. Bongolian (talk) 02:42, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Sorry. I made this when I was younger and stupid. I'll bury the turd now. --Goatspeed. _{See what I'm up to}CircularRasoning^{Prototype lab} 02:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

OK, good for you. Bongolian (talk) 02:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Kinda dissapointing

I imagined the article to be really THAT bad but neither it and the vandalism are that flagrant (also your newer works is kinda equally the same in tone)^{— Unsigned, by: Skibidibiden / talk / contribs}

Perhaps

... "Vandalising" by inserting references to the Real World would be allowed by RW? Anna Livia (talk) 15:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)

no it would be vandalising. they are not interested in the factual. its schafly's baby, him and his pals get to say what they want there, not us poking them with a stick of facts AMassiveGay (talk) 11:04, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Besides which, remember that if you want to edit Conservapedia in 2024, you have to email Andy and ask him to create an account for you, you have to tell him what you plan to do there and provide him with two character references for you. So you can forget about trying to change it for good or ill. Spud (talk) 11:29, 18 August 2024 (UTC)

Given that I am female, a Brit, and of the small-l UK liberal and agnostic persuasions, and have occasionally glanced at the front page of The Morning Star if it happened to be near my newspaper on the news stand, 'a tad unlikely.'

Uncyclopedia (and equivalents) would be vandalised by adding correct information.Anna Livia (talk) 19:47, 18 August 2024 (UTC)