Fun talk:Delicious

But wait, how can animals and plants share the same gene? The evidence that it appears in cherry tomatoes, couscous and avacados, among many others, is clearly evidence of the presence of an Intelligent Chef, doing prep work beyond our understanding. --Kels 14:50, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

Clearly His Noodly Appendage works in mysterious ways. Trashbat 15:09, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

As science has no current explanation for the delicious gene then there is something science cannot explain. Consequently evolution is false. If evolution is false then YEC must be true, and the existence of god is simultaneously proved. It's all so easy really isn't it? All from the existence of the delicious gene. (Ps - should this have a pseudoscience tag?)--Bob_M (talk) 15:29, 26 June 2007 (CDT)

I moved this here cause I can;t figure out what it means: "(although, thanks to a self-avoiding mechanic, this rarely occurs)". I'm also gonna copy BobM's brilliant series of sellojisms above to the article. And, yes, it should have a su-su-sudosience tag. human^{be in} 19:29, 3 July 2007 (CDT)

How can there be more goat here?

How can this page be said to "need more goat"? Isn't "delicious" inherently part of the definition of "goat", and/or vice-versa? --AKjeldsen^Godspeed! 17:37, 24 July 2007 (CDT)

Like breasts, goats are always relevant. Wow, more than four years...Z3100x (talk) 05:32, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Snark is also always relevant (replying after five years). 82.44.143.26 (talk) 13:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Deletion attempt

Hmmm, funny how the deletionists have not posted any reason to remove this hilarious article from the "fun" namespace. Hmmm? Bueller? ħuman 05:37, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Remember that you are not on Conservapedia; there is no such thing as Oversight here. ListenerX^TalkerX 05:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete: yea

1. Blue (pester) 06:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
2. ListenerX^TalkerX 06:24, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
3. Тyrannis^{An iron, but caring, fist} 11:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
4. --il'Dictator Mikal 15:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
5. We've deleted a lot of funnier stuff from the CP space, what makes this so special? Генгис^{You have the right to be offended; and I have the right to offend you.} 17:14, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Appearing in the RC, I imagine. I never remember where the "kill CP and fun!" discussion page is. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 17:19, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Delete: nay

N.B.: Human and Nutty Roux have both loudly expressed opposition to deleting this page. ListenerX^TalkerX 06:25, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

1. I can yell for myself. If you don't think this is funny you both don't understand creationism and live a life without joy. 13:34, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
2. While it isn't a great entry, I don't see any real reason to delete it, nor has one been offered. It seems we're getting a little deletion happy of late. Since when is RW all srs bsns? Turpis 3:16 (talk) 13:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
3. Silly and a bit grammar-deficient, but hey, that's funspace. ~ Kupochama^[1][2] 16:00, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
4. I didn't get the Jacko/Pikachu image, which I've removed. The rest seems benign enough by funspace standards & I'd be happy to keep it, though I don't care massively either way. Weaseloid^{Methinks it is a Weasel} 16:10, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
5. This a classic RW joke, and dates back to before the mists of time. The "delicious gene" is so hilarious I just fell off my chair again. If it is deleted I will recreate it upon pain of being stuffed with truffles and roasted slowly over hickory. ħuman 02:48, 22 May 2012 (UTC)

Please keep in mind this is the funspace

Articles here don't need to beaten into "mission" acceptability. ħuman 03:47, 22 May 2012 (UTC)