Fun talk:Proof that all odd numbers are prime

	This uncategorized article has been awarded BRONZE status for quality. It's getting there, but could be better with improvement. See RationalWiki:Article rating for more information.

(create an archive)

I know we didn't really write this (where did we steal it?) but it's godawful funny. Best of amusement? ħuman 05:10, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

It's all over. There's a lot more actual examples - look at just the first result. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 06:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, I figured. Oh well. It's still funny. Hell, we didn't make up Poe's Law but we are a big hit for it... ħuman 06:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

If this is a steal, then no to best of funny, otherwise we may as well nick anything from all over. Our "Best of"s should be us showing how good we are, not how much we use StumbleUpon. Totnesmartin 11:39, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

I took that as read when it was all over teh web. ^{This message brought to you by: respond}_and honey 11:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Do we have a Best of Fun? And if so, where can I find it? DickTurpis (talk) 01:11, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, it's some cat. Got to mainpage. Click on any of the "fun & recipes" articles that aren't recipes. Scroll down, see category, click on link. ... Profit! ħuman 03:21, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Eh? Fuck that! Too much work. Why can't we have a, you know, RationalWiki:Best of Fun page or something? DickTurpis (talk) 03:35, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

took me eight seconds. What, are you drunker than Iself? ħuman 03:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Recent additions

After "English majors" the funny starts to leak out of this very rapidly. ħuman 22:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Nah, I laughed out loud at the New Agers one. Let it orbit the shark a few more times - David Gerard (talk) 22:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Some are ok, sure, but some are pretty weak. Perhaps we should split out the ones that aren't math jokes into their own section? ħuman 23:20, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Well, there's no way to turn something into a true RationalWiki endeavor quite like UP OR DOWN VOTING! YAAAAAYYYYYYYY!!!! DickTurpis (talk) 23:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

(You have to imagine that "yaayyyy" as coming from Kermit the Frog. DickTurpis (talk) 23:28, 12 July 2010 (UTC))

Good point! Then can we make the output sorted by vote count? ħuman 23:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

I wasn't entirely serious, but what the hell. Maybe we need an entry: RationalWiki: The numbers 3, 5, and 7 have been shown to be prime. Further odd numbers will be submitted to the mob for up or down voting, and any number receiving 50 or more "up" votes will be added to RationalWiki:Best of Prime Numbers. DickTurpis (talk) 23:56, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Yes. Also, FYP. ^{d hominem} 01:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Also reminds me of that "two cows" thing. RationalWiki: "You have two cows. You promote them both to sysop and repeatedly block them". ^{d hominem} 01:48, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Gawd, I haven't heard a two cows joke in like a decade. ħuman 03:19, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

I smell a fun page coming up... Also: Conservapedia: "You have no cows. All of them have been rangeblocked from the pasture." Tetronian ^{you're clueless} 20:26, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

But you have several deceitful sheep pretending to be cows. --Benod (talk) 20:29, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Don't know how to do this but ti's super obnoxious that you have your "joke" at the otp. The only way to do this trick would be by fiat as I demonstrat in the first entry that I added. ok? - Worst, NS

Star Trek

We must obey the prime directive... 82.44.143.26 (talk) 16:03, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

"Unless I've decided it's okay not to."--Кřěĵ (ṫåɬк) 16:27, 9 September 2017 (UTC)