There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff – we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity.
If everyone who saw this today donated $5, we would meet our goal for 2021.
| Fighting pseudoscience isn't free.|
We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $20 or whatever you can today with !
| It's the|
Plagiarism is stealing and, when caught, makes the plagiarizer look lazy and incompetent. Entire careers have been ruined over the practice. Please, please, please don't do it, even if your original material is in the public domain (And if you must, be sure always to call it please "research").
Also, having your boyfriend/girlfriend edit your paper for you (without double-checking what they did) is plagiarism too. Doubly so when the professor finds out that two pages of what they added for you are ripped directly from encyclopedias available online. So is submitting the same paper for two different classes. Don't try it. People can TA more than one course. Also, just because you never used a source that contains the exact same wording as yours doesn't make what you did original; it just means you and someone else both plagiarized the same person. Seriously – professors are not stupid.
Plagiarism and copyright are orthogonal. Plagiarism is about credit, copyright is about whether you're allowed to copy at all (“copyleft” licenses, like Creative Commons and the GNU Free Documentation License, exist specifically to restrict plagiarism without invoking copyright). There are no laws preventing people from plagiarizing or even completely copying works in the public domain (i.e. works that are not copyrighted), such as work by the United States government, formerly copyrighted works whose copyright expired, or works deliberately put into the public domain by whoever would have held the copyright, but giving credit is still a good idea due to ethical reasons (as opposed to the usual combination of ethical and legal reasons).
(Unless you live in a country which recognises moral rights as part of its copyright law, or has doctrines such as substantial similarity. Then, especially where the former applies, it goes against the law as well.)
This looks like a great place to start!
On the other hand, in order to avoid getting a failing grade for plagiarism, one can consult this website, or better yet, just do your own work.
- Plagiarism: Everybody Into the Pool, The New York Times
- "Very brazen, very lazy, very ignorant, or very entitled. Or perhaps a blend of the four."
- Dissernet — a community network for rooting out plagiarism in Russian publications (Диссернет)
- Such as computer language "expert" Herbert Schildt, who has somehow managed to repeatedly rewrite the same book several dozen times to cover C, C++, or Java without ever changing a word or checking a fact.
- In a less egregious category, popular historian Stephen Ambrose has also occasionally had trouble distinguishing between his own material and that of others.