RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Asexual and aromantic glossary

From RationalWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Asexual and aromantic glossary | Result: Delete[edit]

Asexual and aromantic glossary (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete[edit]

  1. Is hopelessly off mission and contains impenetrable jargon on subjects this wiki should have no interest in. Pizza SLICE.gifChef Moosolini’s Ristorante ItalianoMake a Reservation 17:12, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  2. Overly specific and obsessive. Contains excessive obscure and cryptic terms (particularly in identity microlabels) like "aegosexual", "amatonormativity", "fictosexual", "iculasexual", and other cryptic terms like "peach fuzz", "dragons", and "perioriented" (I know what "squish" is though). I don't know if I speak for authority over asexuals, but considering myself one, I've never heard of any of the microlabels myself. Common terms like aromantic and asexual are already covered in Asexuality. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 17:19, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  3. Veers very quickly into off-mission land. —cosmikdebris talk stalk 18:28, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  4. Seems to be a pointless specific page with no real use to support our existing articles. Techpriest (I am Alpharius! / Pencil.png / Tux icon.png / Shield.png) 18:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  5. -Hastur! (talk) 20:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
  6. Being asexual or aromantic must dramatically increase the amount of spare time you have to make shit up. Smerdis of Tlön, wekʷōm teḱsos. 04:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
    This collection of strange neologisms isn't unique to asexuality or aromanticism. Come on. --It's-a me, Lgm sigpic.png 🎄LeftyGreenMario!🎄 04:26, 1 September 2020 (UTC)

Keep[edit]

Merge/redirect[edit]

  1. Seems way too specialised a page. But the terms ace, aro and aromantic should be rescued and moved to the LGBT glossary. They are in common use. Tulpa001 (talk) 08:45, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Goat[edit]

  • I don’t necessarily oppose this idea in theory, would it be possible to just keep the glossary to terms that are used in other mainspace articles maybe? 💙 ASELAཊལྐ 💙 04:40, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Just saw there’s an LGBTQ glossary, so actually I don’t see much need to keep this one specifically instead of just merging it under some kind of subheading in the other one. 💙 ASELAཊལྐ 💙 04:45, 1 September 2020 (UTC)