There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Block Together
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Block Together | Result: Deleted[edit]
Delete[edit]
- Not clearly missional. FuzzyCatPotato of the Lame Oaks (talk/stalk) 18:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Clearly not missional, except maybe as a sentence in Twitter. Flannan Isle (talk) 18:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Highly doubtful if at all missional. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Jumping on another band wagon here. The article is of dubious missionality, stubby, low quality and confusing to boot (really, what's the point of it?). Vaporise it. ScepticWombat (talk) 19:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
- Burn it. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 01:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Don't see why this is missional.--JorisEnter (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- Less than 24 hours for the AFD, no notification of the original writer and then it's just gone. The hell people?! I put together this article to explain the point of why people seem pre-emptively blocked on twitter and soforth. Zero (talk - contributions) 04:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry. Can you explain why this wouldn't fit as a section in Twitter? FuzzyCatPotato!™ (talk/stalk) 18:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
Merge/redirect[edit]
- To Twitter or Gamergate (maybe) - David Gerard (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)