RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Block Together

Block Together | Result: Deleted

Block Together (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete

1. Not clearly missional. Fuzzy "Cat" Potato, Jr. (talk/stalk) 18:01, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
2. Clearly not missional, except maybe as a sentence in Twitter. Flannan Isle (talk) 18:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
3. Highly doubtful if at all missional. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 18:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
4. Jumping on another band wagon here. The article is of dubious missionality, stubby, low quality and confusing to boot (really, what's the point of it?). Vaporise it. ScepticWombat (talk) 19:55, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
5. Burn it. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 01:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
6. Don't see why this is missional.--JorisEnter (talk) 14:14, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

Keep

1. Less than 24 hours for the AFD, no notification of the original writer and then it's just gone. The hell people?! I put together this article to explain the point of why people seem pre-emptively blocked on twitter and soforth. Zero ^{(talk - contributions)} 04:07, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

   Sorry. Can you explain why this wouldn't fit as a section in Twitter? Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 18:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Merge/redirect

• To Twitter or Gamergate (maybe) - David Gerard (talk) 19:12, 30 March 2016 (UTC)