RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Carly Fiorina

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Carly Fiorina | Result: Redirect to 2016 Republican Party presidential nomination#May run for now[edit]

Carly Fiorina (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Keep[edit]

  1. Nutty Roux (talk) 20:17, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
    Notability = dumb. If she exist & dumb, article. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 04:44, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
    Removing my vote to keep. Instead, I propose it be merged. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 07:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Delete[edit]

  1. Who is this person? Why is she important enough to warrant mention?Brenden (talk) 01:23, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    Do rhetorical questions justify deletion? Nutty Roux (talk) 01:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  2. She's a soon-to-be 2016 Republican presidential candiadate only known for her messy stint as CEO of HP (ie. she has no chance). We don't even have an article on Jeb Bush, in comparison. Osaka Sun (talk) 01:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  3. Not relevant enough. In her defense though I heard Sean Hannity considered her a RINO but I'm not sure.
  4. Merge into 2016_Republican_Party_presidential_nomination. --TiaC (talk) 04:10, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  5. Just a rant. Needs rewrite from scratch. Carpetsmoker (talk) 22:43, 12 January 2015 (UTC)
  6. I actually like the govt./business rant, but agree with David Gerard's goat comment below that sticking it in this article is not the proper venue - ideas for articles that would benefit from this rant are welcome! Cut the relevant biographic info and paste it into the GOP 2016 primary candidate box as already suggested. ScepticWombat (talk) 12:06, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  7. I support a relevant-content merge to 2016 Republican Party presidential nomination with TiaC. 32℉uzzy; 0℃atPotato (talk/stalk) 07:13, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Goat[edit]

  • I'm willing to be convinced, but most of this article is a coatrack for a rant about incompetent businesspeople and their attitudes in general, which doesn't really belong at this title. (If I knew where it did, I'd put it there.) - David Gerard (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
  • I agree with David. --Castaigne (talk) 16:25, 13 January 2015 (UTC)