RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Human mating strategies and sexual preferences

Human mating strategies and sexual preferences | Result: Keep[edit]

This article makes broad statements not supported by the sources in the article. Also, the article is filled with cliches. 💎📀1️⃣ (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Non-Missional Spectral Thief Marshadow (talk) 18:01, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

This was ported over from EvoWiki. It seems to contain a lot of good, valid, and interesting information, even if it doesn't quite fit local prejudices. - Smerdis of Tlön, ^{LOAD "*", 8, 1.} 20:05, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
It's certainly missional (evolution). I would agree with @Smerdis of Tlön. Can @DiamondDisc1 can give us more details on which references do not support the text? Bongolian (talk) 20:16, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Same as the above. Their citation style is different from ours but that's not a problem. In-text citations are still there. Nerd (talk) 21:30, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
I believe it's missional. We do have articles that state pretty plainly the facts such as biology, appendix, Ichthyostega, niche, eukaryote so if you're arguing that this is unmissional because it lacks debunking and snarky attitudes toward the fringe, you'll need to consider those examples I listed. I'm not saying those examples in of alone should mean this page should stay, but you can't single out the article. --It's-a me, Lefty Green Mario! 22:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)