RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Super-uncles theory

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Super-uncles theory | Result: Merged in Homosexuality[edit]

Super-uncles theory (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)


  1. Landmartian permastub, non-missional, unlikely ever to be a useful missional article David Gerard (talk) 21:16, 22 March 2016 (UTC)


  1. Seems only the first sentence remains from Landmartian's initial stub, which he never edited again after its creation. We don't need to delete everything Landmartian had even the slightest involvement in. (talk) 21:21, 22 March 42016 AQD (UTC)
  2. The Super Uncles Theory is missional and noteworthy. It is also discussed academically. Keep. Merge into homosexuality. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 21:37, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
  3. Keep or merge into homosexuality. FuzzyCatPotato of the Unrefined Ripples (talk/stalk) 21:38, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
  4. Being created by Landmartian is not enough to have it deleted.--Kugelschreiber (talk) (mail) (block) 08:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC) 08:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC)


  1. It's got decent references and text, but we probably don't need an article about one particular hypothesis for how a tendency to homosexuality could have evolutionary advantages. Either merge into an evolution or homosexuality article or create a new 'hypotheses on the origin of homosexuality' article with some more candidates. Queexchthonic murmurings 11:22, 23 March 2016 (UTC)
  2. Just going to point out that me and FCP support merging in our Keep votes. That makes 3 for Merge as well. Reverend Black Percy (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
  3. Merge into homosexuality. ClickerClock (talk) 03:45, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
  4. The gay uncle hypothesis has some evolutionary credence. Richard Dawkins for one takes it seriously. Best to merge it to the general article I suppose. AlwaysUnite (talk) 23:54, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
  5. Joining the merger choir. Make it a subsection of homosexuality (leaving a redirect) as it's relevant and ref.ed, but too stubby (and probably a bit too obscure) to merit an article of its own. ScepticWombat (talk) 10:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)
  6. Merge methinks. Pbfreespace3 (talk) 01:21, 28 March 2016 (UTC)
  7. Merge it into homosexuality.--JorisEnter (talk) 08:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)