There is no RationalWiki without you. We are a small non-profit with no staff—we are hundreds of volunteers who document pseudoscience and crankery around the world every day. We will never allow ads because we must remain independent. We cannot rely on big donors with corresponding big agendas. We are not the largest website around, but we believe we play an important role in defending truth and objectivity. |
Fighting pseudoscience isn't free. We are 100% user-supported! Help and donate $5, $10, $20 or whatever you can today with ![]() ![]() |
RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Tasseography
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Tasseography | Result: Merged[edit]
- Tasseography – (View log)
Delete[edit]
Can someone remake this article so that it isn't awful?💠💿☝️ (talk) 04:31, 4 September 2017 (UTC) I agree with the merge crowd. I apologize for jumping to deletion instead of finding another way.-💠💿☝️ (talk) 20:49, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's alright. You thought it was the best option at the time, and I probably would have made the same judgment too. RoninMacbeth (talk) 21:13, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- And, well, I did. RoninMacbeth (talk) 21:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Keep[edit]
- diamond disc wants somebody else to improve an article he doesn't like. Doesn't look like grounds for deletion from here. Nudescendant (talk) 09:29, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- I have expanded the article. There is not a whole lot to say about this divination practice in particular. Too well known for us to ignore entirely. I wouldn't terribly mind if this were merged with a general page on folk divination practices, but I'm not sure we have that article yet either. Again we're still a wiki, and being a stub is no reason to delete an article. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 15:32, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Liberapedia has a major stub issue. We don't want that, do we? People need to realize that having a lot of stubs is not a good thing.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara
(talk • stalk) 16:21, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- We have a somewhat more lively base of editors than they do. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 15:57, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
- Liberapedia has a major stub issue. We don't want that, do we? People need to realize that having a lot of stubs is not a good thing.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara
Merge/redirect[edit]
- Perhaps have a general 'folk divination methods' page - as most will individually be too marginal for RW. Anna Livia (talk) 09:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Merge to divination. Mʀ. Wʜɪsᴋᴇʀs, Esϙᴜɪʀᴇ (talk/stalk) 17:27, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- What FCP said.—Hamburguesa con queso con un cara
(talk • stalk) 17:28, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Yeah. Also, we should do the same with the Palmistry article. RoninMacbeth (talk) 17:36, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- There's much more to say about palmistry than about tea leaf reading, and a much bigger literature. One day I may get around to it. - Smerdis of Tlön, LOAD "*", 8, 1. 18:25, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- Better option.-💠💿☝️ (talk) 20:33, 4 September 2017 (UTC)