Information icon.svg Nominations and campaigning for the RationalWiki 2021 Moderator Election are completed. Voting is live now, until 17:00 UTC, 30 November!

RationalWiki:Articles for deletion/Woolston-Steen Theological Seminary

From RationalWiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Woolston-Steen Theological Seminary | Result: delete[edit]

Woolston-Steen Theological Seminary (edit|talk|history|protect|delete|links|watch|logs) – (View log)


  1. Wicca being passed off as a legit basis for a post-secondary education? How is that not germane to the mission? Improve/expand the article, and if one suburban goth kid changes her mind about given them her money, we've done our job here. Father Vivian O'Blivion (talk) 17:39, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
    • That's something I could get on board with, if you could extend how this passes off as legit education (might be some cultural barrier here, from my point of view, it just looks like a flyer distributed outside my yoga lesson). With a link from the main wicca article.--dx (talk) 10:07, 20 May 2014 (UTC)


  1. The article is very bare, could use some improvement but it makes me wonder if it qualifies as helpful. Zero (talk) 15:33, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  2. Unless it's more than what it seems (garden-variety religious mumbo-jumbo), I don't see any reason to keep it. MarmotHead (talk) 16:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  3. I don't see how a course listing like that brings more than just looking at their website, unless it's a very stealthy snark--dx (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  4. This article is the unholy trifecta of off-mission, short and pointless. Kill with with fire, extreme prejudice and extremely prejudiced fire. --|₹Λ¥$€₦₦ Red rose 02.svg i mustn't run away i mustn't run away i mustn't run away 19:23, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
  5. "Who cares"--Miekal 01:33, 23 May 2014 (UTC)


  1. I can't see this being expanded much, or even at all, unless someone sends off for materials, and even then it'd just be standard Wiccan stuff. Merge with Wicca. SophieWilderModerator 15:48, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  2. Undue attention? Is this wikipedia? Ikanreed (talk) 17:29, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  3. I'm not sure whether to keep this or not, perhaps we should research and see if there's more information accessible that we can add. At most we should merge, we certainly shouldn't delete. Proxima Centauri (talk) 17:51, 19 May 2014 (UTC)
  4. There's gotta be a story here - David Gerard (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2014 (UTC)