RationalWiki:Moderator elections/Nominations/Archive5

Nominees should accept or decline the nomination by signing next to their name.
When nominating somebody else, it is considerate to inform them so that they don't miss the opportunity to accept the nomination.

The campaigns and the information supplied by individual candidates may be found here if anyone bothers to post any.

Nominations

Nominations are open until December 29th.

• AD--^talk 22:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
• Andy Franklinson Eh, why not? --Andy^{not Schlafly} 13:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
• Armondikov
• Blue I have had my motives questioned too fucking much over the last year and a half. I no longer believe that this site actually needs or deserves moderators, and I have no confidence that the institution will ever be functional. If I want to help RW, my efforts are far better spent elsewhere. Blue (is useful) 17:12, 17 December 2012 (UTC) Having seen a show of support on my talk page and considering there are far too few candidates this time, I'd like to put forth my make once again, perhaps in the futile hope thaI can do done more good. Blue (pester) 21:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)
• Cretinous incompetent
• David Gerard - David Gerard (talk) 10:05, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
• Ghengis Khant - Генгис^unbelieving 09:17, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
• HeidelbergKid - Thanks, ToP. I really appreciate it. Flatworms are fun! ^{Talk to me} 13:26, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
• KnightOfTL;DR I suppose I am good at yelling at people, but what I really want to do is start content-creation programs, such as improvement drives (challenge: improve stub to article, article to bronze brainstar, bronze to silver, etc.) or maybe even start up the article-a-week club again. I think we need more activities to build some community that isn't based on calling other people stupid in the bar or on WIGO somewhere. Also, maybe a directory of users-by-experience, so when people make new pages, they can quickly find editors that have experience in the related field and contact them for assistance.±KnightOfTL;DR^{going galt: the literal crazy train} 05:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
• Lily Not at the moment, thank you.  Lily ^{Inspirate me.} 22:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
• Nebuchadnezzar
• Mikal - What the hell, why not, I can atleast try and be helpful. --Mikal ^{Harass Follow} 18:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
• Osaka Sun - Decline, sorry. Osaka Sun (talk) 08:17, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
• PeterL --Peter ^{Subsisting on honey} 05:18, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
• Psygremlin
• Refugee - Sorry must decline. Not enough time. Thanks though! :-) Refugee^{talk page} 01:52, 16 December 2012 (UTC)
• Reckless Noise Symphony Thanks for the nomination, but I have no interest in the drama here, and would just as soon LANCB than be stuck in the middle of such childish nonsense. Reckless Noise Symphony (talk) 09:20, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Politics aside, seems like a pretty cool guy, and would be a level headed moderator. DMorris, on the EIP Network ^{1 855 282 2882} 04:04, 24 December 2012 (UTC)
• Sterile sterile^{sporadic heavy hitter} 23:17, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
• Stabby the Misanthrope A big helping of drama, with a side order of everything I do as mod being complained about? No thanks. Radioactive afikomen ^{Please ignore all my awful pre-2014 comments.} 19:46, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
• TheoryOfPractice Decline. Prone to LANCB drama, trying to stay focused on work. Theory of Practice "Now we stand outcast and starving 'mid the wonders we have made." 13:53, 14 December 2012 (UTC)
• Tyrannis Give fascism a chance. Humorless fascist^sociopath 21:36, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
• WaitingforGodot There are real trolls here, and we need to deal with them when they come. The last year has been fairly quiet, on the troll front, despite some measure of concern trolling. I will not use mod rights to get in the middle of bickering between established users under the "naming him a troll" game. I will do all i can to quickly deal with real trolls that damage our site, or cause real headaches.Godot She was a venus demilo in her sister's jeans 21:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
• 84.198.53.190 - Do numbers go at the top or the bottom? ; ) —84.198.53.190 (talk) 02:01, 28 December 2012 (UTC) IPs? Don't think so. Blue (pester) 21:40, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

  Dang. I guess IP emancipation still has a long road ahead. ; ) —84.198.53.190 (talk) 22:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)